Engaging the everyday: the concept and practice of ‘everyday heritage’

In this paper, we explore what it means to link heritage to the everyday, how this has been framed in the field of heritage studies to date and how engagement with the everyday might generate future opportunities for heritage practice. We highlight distinctive aspects of everyday heritage, including its post-representative nature, the importance of urban activism, digital and historical forms of cultural participation, as well as its aesthetic re-framing of the ordinary. We conclude that while the term is often used to describe a non-hegemonic, unofficial form of heritage, everyday heritage tends to merge the authorised and the unauthorised. We finish by distilling our findings into a working manifesto for everyday heritage as a provocation for future discussion and debate on this topic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Heritage Studies
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2024.2417066
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
58.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging the everyday: the concept and practice of ‘everyday heritage’

Tracy Ireland, Sharon Veale, Jane Lydon, Steve Brown et al.
20 citations
International Journal of Heritage Studies
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
58.48
article

Engaging the everyday: the concept and practice of ‘everyday heritage’

Tracy Ireland, Sharon Veale, Jane Lydon, Steve Brown, Tim Sherratt, Kate Bagnall
article en
20 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we explore what it means to link heritage to the everyday, how this has been framed in the field of heritage studies to date and how engagement with the everyday might generate future opportunities for heritage practice. We highlight distinctive aspects of everyday heritage, including its post-representative nature, the importance of urban activism, digital and historical forms of cultural participation, as well as its aesthetic re-framing of the ordinary. We conclude that while the term is often used to describe a non-hegemonic, unofficial form of heritage, everyday heritage tends to merge the authorised and the unauthorised. We finish by distilling our findings into a working manifesto for everyday heritage as a provocation for future discussion and debate on this topic.

International Journal of Heritage StudiesVol. 31(2)
University of Tasmania (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Canberra (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
58.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.