Gatekeeper training for youth suicide prevention: A mixed method comparative analysis of two online programs

Abstract The overriding aim of this study was to conduct a side‐by‐side comparative evaluation of two online suicide prevention gatekeeper‐training programs: Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR) and Making Educators Partners in Youth Suicide Prevention (MEP). Specific aims included identifying program components, instructional methods, and technology elements that are well received by school personnel and that increase knowledge and self‐efficacy. QPR and MEP were directly assessed following levels one and two of Kirkpatrick's Model (i.e., reactions to training, program efficacy), and indirectly assessed at levels three and four (i.e., future gatekeeper behaviors, potential school community impact). QPR and MEP produced positive outcomes with respect to reactions, knowledge, and self‐efficacy (i.e., Kirkpatrick levels one and two). MEP and QPR also produced partial support with respect to behavior and impact (i.e., Kirkpatrick levels three and four), given the limited objective data demonstrating consistent application of gatekeeper skills that reduce community suicidal behaviors. Taken together, future research should evaluate inclusion of innovative pedagogical approaches and strategic online classroom design, which may enhance learning motivation, attitudes, and self‐efficacy. Research should also objectively evaluate intermediate and longer‐term behavioral outcomes to identify population‐level impact.