Left-Right Differences in Oral Function and Quality of Life of Patients Who Underwent Tongue Resection

Background The tongue plays an important role in oral functions, including articulation, eating, and swallowing. The treatment of tongue cancer (TC) often leads to oral morbidities, such as limited mouth opening, dry mouth, swallowing difficulties, and mucositis. The anterior-posterior resection area of the tongue has a significant impact on oral function and quality of life (QOL). However, the specific left-right differences in oral function of patients who underwent tongue resection remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of left-right differences on oral function and QOL in patients with TC who underwent tongue resection. Methodology This study included 40 patients with TC who underwent surgical resection smaller than hemiglossectomy and were divided into left (LG) and right (RG) tongue groups. The oral, respiratory, and feeding functions and the QOL at baseline (before treatment) and one, three, and six months after treatment (1M, 3M, and 6M, respectively) were evaluated. Maximum tongue pressure and lip-closure force were used to evaluate the oral functions. Peak expiratory flow was used to evaluate the respiratory function. The Functional Oral Intake Scale was used to evaluate the feeding functions. The QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaires: QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35. Results The results indicated that there were no significant differences in oral, respiratory, or feeding function between the LG and RG groups at all evaluation periods. However, regarding QOL assessments, at 3M, LG indicated a significantly higher score than RG for swallowing (LG = 3.17, RG = 10.00, p = 0.037) and trouble with social eating (LG = 12.30, RG = 20.56, p = 0.025) in the EORTC QLQ-H&N35. At 6M, the LG also indicated a significantly higher QOL than RG for global health status (LG = 81.14, RG = 65.69, p = 0.018) and physical function (LG = 96.51, RG = 89.80, p = 0.047) in the EORTC QLQ-C30. Conclusions While the left-right differences in tongue function did not lead to functional impairment post-surgery, they significantly affected the QOL. The results indicate the importance of considering these differences in postoperative care to effectively address the QOL concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71831
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Left-Right Differences in Oral Function and Quality of Life of Patients Who Underwent Tongue Resection

Shinji Nozue, Kouta Nagoya, Yuichi Tashimo, Yoshiaki Ihara et al.
1 citations
Cureus
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
0.87
article

Left-Right Differences in Oral Function and Quality of Life of Patients Who Underwent Tongue Resection

Shinji Nozue, Kouta Nagoya, Yuichi Tashimo, Yoshiaki Ihara, Toshikazu Shimane, Mitsunori Ishiguro, Yuka Harada, Tomoki Tamai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background The tongue plays an important role in oral functions, including articulation, eating, and swallowing. The treatment of tongue cancer (TC) often leads to oral morbidities, such as limited mouth opening, dry mouth, swallowing difficulties, and mucositis. The anterior-posterior resection area of the tongue has a significant impact on oral function and quality of life (QOL). However, the specific left-right differences in oral function of patients who underwent tongue resection remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of left-right differences on oral function and QOL in patients with TC who underwent tongue resection. Methodology This study included 40 patients with TC who underwent surgical resection smaller than hemiglossectomy and were divided into left (LG) and right (RG) tongue groups. The oral, respiratory, and feeding functions and the QOL at baseline (before treatment) and one, three, and six months after treatment (1M, 3M, and 6M, respectively) were evaluated. Maximum tongue pressure and lip-closure force were used to evaluate the oral functions. Peak expiratory flow was used to evaluate the respiratory function. The Functional Oral Intake Scale was used to evaluate the feeding functions. The QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaires: QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35. Results The results indicated that there were no significant differences in oral, respiratory, or feeding function between the LG and RG groups at all evaluation periods. However, regarding QOL assessments, at 3M, LG indicated a significantly higher score than RG for swallowing (LG = 3.17, RG = 10.00, p = 0.037) and trouble with social eating (LG = 12.30, RG = 20.56, p = 0.025) in the EORTC QLQ-H&N35. At 6M, the LG also indicated a significantly higher QOL than RG for global health status (LG = 81.14, RG = 65.69, p = 0.018) and physical function (LG = 96.51, RG = 89.80, p = 0.047) in the EORTC QLQ-C30. Conclusions While the left-right differences in tongue function did not lead to functional impairment post-surgery, they significantly affected the QOL. The results indicate the importance of considering these differences in postoperative care to effectively address the QOL concerns.

CureusVol. 16(10)
SHOWA Medical University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
0.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.