Innovation and Adaptation in COVID-19 Pandemic Posthospital Discharge Contact and Monitoring in the United States

<h3>Background</h3> To address unknown risk for readmission among patients with COVID-19 and persistent capacity strain, hospital systems used postdischarge contact and monitoring to facilitate safe discharge and recovery. However, little work has systematically documented how hospitals implemented changes to hospitalization postdischarge contact practices during COVID-19. <h3>Research Question</h3> How did hospitals' innovate and adapt postdischarge telephone follow-up and remote monitoring strategies to assess discharged patients with COVID-19 for risk of readmission and recovery progress? <h3>Study Design and Methods</h3> Semistructured interviews were conducted (January 2022 to March 2023) with 70 inpatient and outpatient providers and administrators (5-12 per site) in nine health systems that varied by size, region, rurality, proportion of Medicaid patients, and estimated scale of post-COVID-19 care organization. Participants described innovation in and implementation of discharge and postdischarge care processes used to assess patients with COVID-19 for readmission risk and recovery progress. The primary analysis was site-level case comparative analysis. <h3>Results</h3> Respondents described hospital systems' motivations for adapting preexisting resources and innovating new postdischarge programs, including postdischarge telephone follow-up and remote monitoring programs, to facilitate safe hospital discharge and transitions to ambulatory care for patients with COVID-19. Respondents also explained various factors that influenced the implementation and use of postdischarge contact practices. Participants perceived that these practices mitigated postdischarge risks and alleviated capacity strain. Respondents described retiring or adapting remote monitoring programs for other conditions as COVID-19 demands declined. <h3>Interpretation</h3> Our results show that hospitals implemented and adapted postdischarge practices to help facilitate recovery and address unknown risk for readmission during the pandemic. Some efforts may present opportunities to manage readmission concerns and capacity strain more generally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CHEST Critical Care
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100101
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovation and Adaptation in COVID-19 Pandemic Posthospital Discharge Contact and Monitoring in the United States

Sara E. Golden, Jacquelyn Miller, Katrina Hauschildt, Kelly C. Vranas et al.
CHEST Critical Care
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Innovation and Adaptation in COVID-19 Pandemic Posthospital Discharge Contact and Monitoring in the United States

Sara E. Golden, Jacquelyn Miller, Katrina Hauschildt, Kelly C. Vranas, Catherine L. Hough, Aluko A. Hope, Nathan Wright, Thomas S. Valley, Katharine Seagly, Lars Wilhelmsen, Amanda Schutz
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> To address unknown risk for readmission among patients with COVID-19 and persistent capacity strain, hospital systems used postdischarge contact and monitoring to facilitate safe discharge and recovery. However, little work has systematically documented how hospitals implemented changes to hospitalization postdischarge contact practices during COVID-19. <h3>Research Question</h3> How did hospitals' innovate and adapt postdischarge telephone follow-up and remote monitoring strategies to assess discharged patients with COVID-19 for risk of readmission and recovery progress? <h3>Study Design and Methods</h3> Semistructured interviews were conducted (January 2022 to March 2023) with 70 inpatient and outpatient providers and administrators (5-12 per site) in nine health systems that varied by size, region, rurality, proportion of Medicaid patients, and estimated scale of post-COVID-19 care organization. Participants described innovation in and implementation of discharge and postdischarge care processes used to assess patients with COVID-19 for readmission risk and recovery progress. The primary analysis was site-level case comparative analysis. <h3>Results</h3> Respondents described hospital systems' motivations for adapting preexisting resources and innovating new postdischarge programs, including postdischarge telephone follow-up and remote monitoring programs, to facilitate safe hospital discharge and transitions to ambulatory care for patients with COVID-19. Respondents also explained various factors that influenced the implementation and use of postdischarge contact practices. Participants perceived that these practices mitigated postdischarge risks and alleviated capacity strain. Respondents described retiring or adapting remote monitoring programs for other conditions as COVID-19 demands declined. <h3>Interpretation</h3> Our results show that hospitals implemented and adapted postdischarge practices to help facilitate recovery and address unknown risk for readmission during the pandemic. Some efforts may present opportunities to manage readmission concerns and capacity strain more generally.

CHEST Critical CareVol. 2(4)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), University of Michigan (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US), VA Portland Health Care System (US)
American Lung Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.