Is promotion competition responsible for local protectionism in China?

This study investigates the promotion competition for local protectionism in China. Since the personnel evaluation criteria in China shifted from political loyalty to economic performance, local governments strive to pursue regional tax benefits and political promotion opportunities, often adopting a range of protective measures to support the economic development of their regions. However, these actions can significantly impede the normal functioning of the market and result in local protectionism. Addressing local protectionism is crucial for accelerating the establishment of a nationally unified market characterized by fair competition and full openness. Overcoming local protectionism necessitates not only an environment conducive to fair competition, but also the active coordination of local officials. This study investigates the factors that influence local protectionism in China using the spatial econometric methods. Applying provincial panel data spanning the years 2003 to 2019, the study focuses on promotion competition among local officials that contributes to local protectionism. The results of an empirical study show that local protectionism is spatially related between regions. This means that when foreign government implements local protection policies, the local government responds with similar measures, and the level of response varies between regions. Additionally, the spatial spillover effect of promotion competition on local protectionism is found to be significant, with the impact displaying variations across different phases. The findings offer a new understanding of the issue of local protectionism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Development Policy Review
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55493/5008.v12i4.5207
Citations
1
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is promotion competition responsible for local protectionism in China?

Xiaobing Le, Sarma Binti Aralas
1 citations
Asian Development Policy Review
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
2.23
article

Is promotion competition responsible for local protectionism in China?

Xiaobing Le, Sarma Binti Aralas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the promotion competition for local protectionism in China. Since the personnel evaluation criteria in China shifted from political loyalty to economic performance, local governments strive to pursue regional tax benefits and political promotion opportunities, often adopting a range of protective measures to support the economic development of their regions. However, these actions can significantly impede the normal functioning of the market and result in local protectionism. Addressing local protectionism is crucial for accelerating the establishment of a nationally unified market characterized by fair competition and full openness. Overcoming local protectionism necessitates not only an environment conducive to fair competition, but also the active coordination of local officials. This study investigates the factors that influence local protectionism in China using the spatial econometric methods. Applying provincial panel data spanning the years 2003 to 2019, the study focuses on promotion competition among local officials that contributes to local protectionism. The results of an empirical study show that local protectionism is spatially related between regions. This means that when foreign government implements local protection policies, the local government responds with similar measures, and the level of response varies between regions. Additionally, the spatial spillover effect of promotion competition on local protectionism is found to be significant, with the impact displaying variations across different phases. The findings offer a new understanding of the issue of local protectionism.

Asian Development Policy ReviewVol. 12(4)
Universiti of Malaysia Sabah (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is promotion competition responsible for local protectionism in China? — Xiaobing Le, Sarma Binti Aralas · Asian Development Policy Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS