Towards harmonization of metal(loid)s determination in conventional and compostable plastics: Comparison of acid digestion protocols in LDPE and PBAT/TPS blends

The determination of metal-containing additives in plastic materials via acid digestion protocols has attracted growing interest to address potential environmental implications. However, the lack of protocol harmonization hinders data comparability within the literature. Here, six acid digestion protocols were employed to determine the metal(loid) content in plastics: these included three different acid mixtures (HNO<sub>3</sub> combined with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, HCl or H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) for microwave-assisted digestion, with or without an additional room-temperature digestion step with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. Each protocol was first validated for seven metal(loid)s (As, Cd, Cr, Pb, Sb, Sn and Zn) using a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) certified reference material (ERM®-EC681m). Then, validated protocols were applied on end-use materials, including conventional (i.e., LDPE) and compostable (i.e., PBAT/TPS) plastics. The combination of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and HNO<sub>3</sub> with a further digestion step with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was the most suitable protocol: it successfully passed validation thresholds for all metal(loid)s (recoveries in the range 98.6-101.0 %) and yielded the highest concentrations in end-use materials. All other protocols resulted in a less efficient digestion of the sample matrix, leading to lower recoveries and the formation of solid residues. Notably, end-use plastics showed a great variability in metal(loid) concentrations, likely due to their additive-rich composition, in contrast to the minimal content of acid-soluble additives of the reference material. This study represents an initial step towards the harmonization of acid digestion protocols and highlights new challenges in accurately analyzing end-use plastic materials, due to their complex additive composition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemosphere
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143581
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards harmonization of metal(loid)s determination in conventional and compostable plastics: Comparison of acid digestion protocols in LDPE and PBAT/TPS blends

Roberta Bettinetti, Luca Nizzetto, Luigi Botta, Andrea Pozzi et al.
3 citations
Chemosphere
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
0.88
article

Towards harmonization of metal(loid)s determination in conventional and compostable plastics: Comparison of acid digestion protocols in LDPE and PBAT/TPS blends

Roberta Bettinetti, Luca Nizzetto, Luigi Botta, Andrea Pozzi, Stefano Carnati, Gilberto Binda, Gabriela Kalčíková, Davide Spanu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The determination of metal-containing additives in plastic materials via acid digestion protocols has attracted growing interest to address potential environmental implications. However, the lack of protocol harmonization hinders data comparability within the literature. Here, six acid digestion protocols were employed to determine the metal(loid) content in plastics: these included three different acid mixtures (HNO<sub>3</sub> combined with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, HCl or H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) for microwave-assisted digestion, with or without an additional room-temperature digestion step with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. Each protocol was first validated for seven metal(loid)s (As, Cd, Cr, Pb, Sb, Sn and Zn) using a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) certified reference material (ERM®-EC681m). Then, validated protocols were applied on end-use materials, including conventional (i.e., LDPE) and compostable (i.e., PBAT/TPS) plastics. The combination of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and HNO<sub>3</sub> with a further digestion step with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was the most suitable protocol: it successfully passed validation thresholds for all metal(loid)s (recoveries in the range 98.6-101.0 %) and yielded the highest concentrations in end-use materials. All other protocols resulted in a less efficient digestion of the sample matrix, leading to lower recoveries and the formation of solid residues. Notably, end-use plastics showed a great variability in metal(loid) concentrations, likely due to their additive-rich composition, in contrast to the minimal content of acid-soluble additives of the reference material. This study represents an initial step towards the harmonization of acid digestion protocols and highlights new challenges in accurately analyzing end-use plastic materials, due to their complex additive composition.

ChemosphereVol. 367
University of Insubria (IT), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO), Brno University of Technology (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
0.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.