Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions

Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing 'boundaries' between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to 'boundary work'. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs' perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions

Christian Albert, Berit Balfors, Ulla Mörtberg, Blal Adem Esmail et al.
1 citations
AMBIO
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
0.28
article

Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions

Christian Albert, Berit Balfors, Ulla Mörtberg, Blal Adem Esmail, Jarumi Kato-Huerta, Chiara Cortinovis, Cristhian Anderson, Davide Geneletti, Lina Suleiman, Johan Högström, Gustavo Arciniegas, Sigvard Bast
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing 'boundaries' between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to 'boundary work'. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs' perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.

AMBIOVol. 54(2)
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Eurac Research (IT), University of Trento (IT), Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine (IT), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Vetenskapsrådet, Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.