Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions
Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing 'boundaries' between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to 'boundary work'. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs' perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.
Authors
- Christian Albert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2591-4779)
- Berit Balfors (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0214-3921)
- Ulla Mörtberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1640-8946)
- Blal Adem Esmail (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-565X)
- Jarumi Kato-Huerta
- Chiara Cortinovis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-4731)
- Cristhian Anderson
- Davide Geneletti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-3365)
- Lina Suleiman
- Johan Högström
- Gustavo Arciniegas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9211-5467)
- Sigvard Bast
Institutions
- Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
- Eurac Research (IT)
- University of Trento (IT)
- Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine (IT)
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- AMBIO
- Published
- 2024-10-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.28
Funders
- Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum