Development of an Evaluation Instrument on Artificial Intelligence Search Tools for Evidence Synthesis

What Was the Question? There are conflicting calls for evidence synthesis producers to adopt or avoid recent Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. Our question was: How do we evaluate rapidly evolving AI tools to enhance the production of evidence syntheses and maintain quality standards? What Did We Do? To advance information retrieval science for producing evidence syntheses at Canada’s Drug Agency (CDA-AMC), the Research Information Services team developed a process to evaluate promising AI search tools. We inventoried 51 tools in the fall of 2023, established selection criteria, assessed specific attributes, and built a standalone instrument to support continuous monitoring and evaluation of new tools. What Did We Find? Rapid development of AI search tools requires a flexible evaluation instrument to inform adoption decisions and enable comparison between tools. We identified mandatory and desirable characteristics for suitable AI tools to assist with information retrieval tasks conducted by CDA-AMC. This work enabled the development of a flexible instrument to evaluate novel AI search tools for evidence synthesis. What Does This Mean? CDA-AMC operationalized a replicable process to monitor and evaluate AI search tools. Our approach to evaluating AI technologies will advance information retrieval methods by CDA-AMC, and our evaluation instrument will assist any evidence synthesis producer interested in adopting AI search tools.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Health Technologies
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.1004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of an Evaluation Instrument on Artificial Intelligence Search Tools for Evidence Synthesis

CDA-AMC
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Health Technologies
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
article

Development of an Evaluation Instrument on Artificial Intelligence Search Tools for Evidence Synthesis

CDA-AMC
article en
1 citations

Abstract

What Was the Question? There are conflicting calls for evidence synthesis producers to adopt or avoid recent Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. Our question was: How do we evaluate rapidly evolving AI tools to enhance the production of evidence syntheses and maintain quality standards? What Did We Do? To advance information retrieval science for producing evidence syntheses at Canada’s Drug Agency (CDA-AMC), the Research Information Services team developed a process to evaluate promising AI search tools. We inventoried 51 tools in the fall of 2023, established selection criteria, assessed specific attributes, and built a standalone instrument to support continuous monitoring and evaluation of new tools. What Did We Find? Rapid development of AI search tools requires a flexible evaluation instrument to inform adoption decisions and enable comparison between tools. We identified mandatory and desirable characteristics for suitable AI tools to assist with information retrieval tasks conducted by CDA-AMC. This work enabled the development of a flexible instrument to evaluate novel AI search tools for evidence synthesis. What Does This Mean? CDA-AMC operationalized a replicable process to monitor and evaluate AI search tools. Our approach to evaluating AI technologies will advance information retrieval methods by CDA-AMC, and our evaluation instrument will assist any evidence synthesis producer interested in adopting AI search tools.

Canadian Journal of Health TechnologiesVol. 4(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.