A numerical evaluation of the Finite Monkeys Theorem
• The long-established result of the Infinite Monkeys Theorem is correct, but misleading. • Non-trivial text generation during the lifespan of our universe is almost certainly impossible. • The Finite Monkeys case shows there will never be sufficient resources to generate Shakespeare. The Infinite Monkeys Theorem has long-established the eventual certainty of the complete works of William Shakespeare being reproduced by a monkey randomly pressing keys on a typewriter. This only considers the infinite limit, with either an infinite number of monkeys and/or an infinite time period of monkey labour. Here, we consider the Finite Monkeys Theorem and look at the probability of a given string being typed by one of a finite number of monkeys within a finite time allocation consistent with estimates for the lifespan of our universe. We also calculate the expected number of keystrokes until a target string would first be produced. Given the expected time until the heat death of the universe, we demonstrate that the widely-accepted conclusion from the Infinite Monkeys Theorem is, in fact, misleading in our finite universe. As such, this places the theorem in a class of probabilistic problems or paradoxes, including the St. Petersburg paradox, Zeno's dichotomy paradox and the Ross–Littlewood paradox wherein the infinite-resource conclusions directly contradict those obtained when considering limited resources, however sizeable.
Authors
- Stephen Woodcock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-3164)
- Jay Falletta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9007-123X)
Institutions
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Franklin Open
- Published
- 2024-10-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fraope.2024.100171
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.22