Direct air capture integration with low-carbon heat: Process engineering and power system analysis

Direct air capture (DAC) of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is energy intensive given the low concentration ( < 0.1%) of CO 2 in ambient air, but offers relatively strong verification of removals and limited land constraints to scale. Lower temperature solid sorbent based DAC could be coupled on-site with low carbon thermal generators such as nuclear power plants. Here, we undertake a unique interdisciplinary study combining process engineering with a detailed macro-energy system optimization model to evaluate the system-level impacts of such plant designs in the Texas electricity system. We contrast this with using grid power to operate a heat pump to regenerate the sorbent. Our analysis identifies net carbon removal costs accounting for power system impacts and resulting indirect CO 2 emissions from DAC energy consumption. We find that inefficient configurations of DAC at a nuclear power plant can lead to increases in power sector emissions relative to a case without DAC, at a scale that would cancel out almost 50% of the carbon removal from DAC. Net removal costs for the most efficient configurations increase by roughly 18% once indirect power system-level impacts are considered, though this is comparable to the indirect systems-level emissions from operating grid-powered heat pumps for sorbent regeneration. Our study therefore highlights the need for DAC energy procurement to be guided by consideration of indirect emission impacts on the electricity system. Finally, DAC could potentially create demand pull for zero carbon firm generation, accelerating decarbonization relative to a world without such DAC deployment. We find that DAC operators would have to be willing to pay existing or new nuclear power plants roughly $30–80/tCO 2 or $150–400/tCO 2 respectively, for input energy, to enable nuclear plants to be economically competitive in least cost electricity markets that do not have carbon constraints or subsidies for nuclear energy. • We build a process model to couple nuclear energy with direct air capture (DAC). • Using existing nuclear plants for DAC can increase system-level CO 2 emissions. • The most efficient configuration diverts steam prior to the low-pressure turbine. • Costs and CO 2 impacts are comparable to using grid powered industrial heat pumps. • DAC’s demand for zero carbon heat can pull in deployment of new nuclear plants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119136
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct air capture integration with low-carbon heat: Process engineering and power system analysis

Fangwei Cheng, Jesse Jenkins, Chris Greig, Hongxi Luo et al.
9 citations
Energy Conversion and Management
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
1.91
article

Direct air capture integration with low-carbon heat: Process engineering and power system analysis

Fangwei Cheng, Jesse Jenkins, Chris Greig, Hongxi Luo, Aniruddh Mohan, Eric D. Larson
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Direct air capture (DAC) of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is energy intensive given the low concentration ( < 0.1%) of CO 2 in ambient air, but offers relatively strong verification of removals and limited land constraints to scale. Lower temperature solid sorbent based DAC could be coupled on-site with low carbon thermal generators such as nuclear power plants. Here, we undertake a unique interdisciplinary study combining process engineering with a detailed macro-energy system optimization model to evaluate the system-level impacts of such plant designs in the Texas electricity system. We contrast this with using grid power to operate a heat pump to regenerate the sorbent. Our analysis identifies net carbon removal costs accounting for power system impacts and resulting indirect CO 2 emissions from DAC energy consumption. We find that inefficient configurations of DAC at a nuclear power plant can lead to increases in power sector emissions relative to a case without DAC, at a scale that would cancel out almost 50% of the carbon removal from DAC. Net removal costs for the most efficient configurations increase by roughly 18% once indirect power system-level impacts are considered, though this is comparable to the indirect systems-level emissions from operating grid-powered heat pumps for sorbent regeneration. Our study therefore highlights the need for DAC energy procurement to be guided by consideration of indirect emission impacts on the electricity system. Finally, DAC could potentially create demand pull for zero carbon firm generation, accelerating decarbonization relative to a world without such DAC deployment. We find that DAC operators would have to be willing to pay existing or new nuclear power plants roughly $30–80/tCO 2 or $150–400/tCO 2 respectively, for input energy, to enable nuclear plants to be economically competitive in least cost electricity markets that do not have carbon constraints or subsidies for nuclear energy. • We build a process model to couple nuclear energy with direct air capture (DAC). • Using existing nuclear plants for DAC can increase system-level CO 2 emissions. • The most efficient configuration diverts steam prior to the low-pressure turbine. • Costs and CO 2 impacts are comparable to using grid powered industrial heat pumps. • DAC’s demand for zero carbon heat can pull in deployment of new nuclear plants.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 322
Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.