Comparison of pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion processes for wheat straw biomass

Due to the growing interest in using biomass as a renewable energy source, this study presents a comparative analysis between two prominent biomass conversion technologies—anaerobic digestion and biomass pyrolysis—focused on wheat straw biomass. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficiency, energy output, and environmental impact. Anaerobic digestion was performed under mesophilic conditions (35 ± 0.5 °C) using the biochemical methanogenic potential (BMP) methodology. Pyrolysis was conducted through thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) to determine the thermal behaviour and kinetic parameters of the biomass. Biogas production led to better energetic results as high methane yields of over 11 mL CH₄ g⁻¹ VS were obtained. Additionally, the integration of both processes was considered by subjecting digestate from anaerobic digestion to pyrolysis process. Key findings demonstrate that the activation energy ( Ea ) for wheat straw ranged from 166.49 to 176.42 kJ·mol −1 across different kinetic methods, indicating its suitability for pyrolysis. In contrast, digestates exhibited significantly lower activation energies, with 1-week, 2-weeks, and 3-weeks digestates showing ranges of 53.27–60.79 kJ·mol −1 , 38.69–46.86 kJ·mol −1 , and 46.29–72.34 kJ·mol −1 , respectively. These results suggest that anaerobic digestion not only produces biogas but also yields a byproduct with potential for efficient pyrolytic conversion suggesting opportunities for integrated waste management and renewable energy production systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.10.016
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion processes for wheat straw biomass

David León, Marcelo F. Ortega, Isabel Amez, Antonio Gascó et al.
9 citations
Energy Reports
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
1.66
article

Comparison of pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion processes for wheat straw biomass

David León, Marcelo F. Ortega, Isabel Amez, Antonio Gascó, Daphne Hermosilla, Blanca Castells, Alfonso García Álvaro
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Due to the growing interest in using biomass as a renewable energy source, this study presents a comparative analysis between two prominent biomass conversion technologies—anaerobic digestion and biomass pyrolysis—focused on wheat straw biomass. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficiency, energy output, and environmental impact. Anaerobic digestion was performed under mesophilic conditions (35 ± 0.5 °C) using the biochemical methanogenic potential (BMP) methodology. Pyrolysis was conducted through thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) to determine the thermal behaviour and kinetic parameters of the biomass. Biogas production led to better energetic results as high methane yields of over 11 mL CH₄ g⁻¹ VS were obtained. Additionally, the integration of both processes was considered by subjecting digestate from anaerobic digestion to pyrolysis process. Key findings demonstrate that the activation energy ( Ea ) for wheat straw ranged from 166.49 to 176.42 kJ·mol −1 across different kinetic methods, indicating its suitability for pyrolysis. In contrast, digestates exhibited significantly lower activation energies, with 1-week, 2-weeks, and 3-weeks digestates showing ranges of 53.27–60.79 kJ·mol −1 , 38.69–46.86 kJ·mol −1 , and 46.29–72.34 kJ·mol −1 , respectively. These results suggest that anaerobic digestion not only produces biogas but also yields a byproduct with potential for efficient pyrolytic conversion suggesting opportunities for integrated waste management and renewable energy production systems.

Energy ReportsVol. 12
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.