Reviewing the complexity of endogenous technological learning for energy system modeling

• Systematic review on technological learning in energy system models. • Discussion of methods for the implementation of technological learning. • Detailed overview of methods for complexity assessment and handling. • Discussion of relevant aspects to consider such as data availability and quality. Energy system components like renewable energy technologies or electrolyzers are subject to decreasing investment costs driven by technological progress. Various methods have been developed in the literature to capture model-endogenous technological learning. This review demonstrates the non-linear relationship between investment costs and production volume, resulting in non-convex optimization problems and discuss concepts to account for technological progress. While iterative solution methods tend to find future energy system designs that rely on suboptimal technology mixes, exact solutions leading to global optimality are computationally demanding. Most studies omit important system aspects such as sector integration, or a detailed spatial, temporal, and technological resolution to maintain model solvability, which likewise distorts the impact of technological learning. This can be improved by the application of methods such as temporal or spatial aggregation, decomposition methods, or the clustering of technologies. This review reveals the potential of those methods and points out important considerations for integrating endogenous technological learning. We propose a more integrated approach to handle computational complexity when integrating technological learning, that aims to preserve the model's feasibility. Furthermore, we identify significant gaps in current modeling practices and suggest future research directions to enhance the accuracy and utility of energy system models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Applied Energy
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2024.100192
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reviewing the complexity of endogenous technological learning for energy system modeling

Detlef Stolten, Maximilian Hoffmann, Jann Michael Weinand, Elisabeth Zeyen et al.
14 citations
Advances in Applied Energy
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
6.87
article

Reviewing the complexity of endogenous technological learning for energy system modeling

Detlef Stolten, Maximilian Hoffmann, Jann Michael Weinand, Elisabeth Zeyen, Johannes Behrens
article en
14 citations

Abstract

• Systematic review on technological learning in energy system models. • Discussion of methods for the implementation of technological learning. • Detailed overview of methods for complexity assessment and handling. • Discussion of relevant aspects to consider such as data availability and quality. Energy system components like renewable energy technologies or electrolyzers are subject to decreasing investment costs driven by technological progress. Various methods have been developed in the literature to capture model-endogenous technological learning. This review demonstrates the non-linear relationship between investment costs and production volume, resulting in non-convex optimization problems and discuss concepts to account for technological progress. While iterative solution methods tend to find future energy system designs that rely on suboptimal technology mixes, exact solutions leading to global optimality are computationally demanding. Most studies omit important system aspects such as sector integration, or a detailed spatial, temporal, and technological resolution to maintain model solvability, which likewise distorts the impact of technological learning. This can be improved by the application of methods such as temporal or spatial aggregation, decomposition methods, or the clustering of technologies. This review reveals the potential of those methods and points out important considerations for integrating endogenous technological learning. We propose a more integrated approach to handle computational complexity when integrating technological learning, that aims to preserve the model's feasibility. Furthermore, we identify significant gaps in current modeling practices and suggest future research directions to enhance the accuracy and utility of energy system models.

Advances in Applied EnergyVol. 16
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Helmholtz Association
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.