Prioritizing sustainability indicators for Uganda's built environment: Expert perspectives using the Delphi technique

• The Delphi approach enabled experts to identify key sustainability indicators • Expert consensus validation using IRA boosted the study's reliability and credibility • The prioritized indicators will enhance building energy performance in Uganda • High inter-group agreement highlights the role of stakeholders in consensus building • The findings influence policy, practice, and research on sustainable construction The growing emphasis on energy efficiency within the built environment, driven by global concerns over climate change, has resulted in notable shifts in building energy consumption patterns. Achieving reductions in building energy use and CO₂ emissions through sustainable strategies necessitates the development of country-specific policies. While numerous energy assessment tools are available internationally, they often lack contextual relevance for Uganda and many Sub-Saharan African countries.Therefore, there is a pressing need for a tool tailored to Uganda's distinct climatic conditions. This study aimed to identify key building sustainability indicators to promote energy efficiency in Ugandan buildings. Utilizing the Delphi Technique, experts from academia, construction, energy consulting, and government agencies evaluated 35 building indicators over two assessment rounds. The consensus among experts was validated using the Interrater Agreement, with a significant Kendall's W value exceeding 0.6, rising from 0.655 in the first round to 0.704 in the second. Construction consultants showed the highest W value (0.77) in the second round, followed by energy consultants (0.74), while academicians had the lowest (0.7). The Chi-square test demonstrated strong agreement in ranking indicators across 34 degrees of freedom. The most significant indicators identified include "B20 - Optimization of energy use," "B8 - Advanced design and construction technology," and "B27 - Natural ventilation design," among others. The Delphi Technique was instrumental in achieving expert consensus, while interrater agreement was used to validate and ensure the reliability of the findings. The developed framework provides critical insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers seeking to advance energy efficiency and sustainability within Uganda's built environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103182
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritizing sustainability indicators for Uganda's built environment: Expert perspectives using the Delphi technique

Joseph Ddumba Lwanyaga, John Baptist Kirabira, Hillary Kasedde, Peter Wilberforce Olupot et al.
4 citations
Results in Engineering
Delphi Technique in Research
4.53
article

Prioritizing sustainability indicators for Uganda's built environment: Expert perspectives using the Delphi technique

Joseph Ddumba Lwanyaga, John Baptist Kirabira, Hillary Kasedde, Peter Wilberforce Olupot, Racheal Wesonga, Derrick Kajjoba
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• The Delphi approach enabled experts to identify key sustainability indicators • Expert consensus validation using IRA boosted the study's reliability and credibility • The prioritized indicators will enhance building energy performance in Uganda • High inter-group agreement highlights the role of stakeholders in consensus building • The findings influence policy, practice, and research on sustainable construction The growing emphasis on energy efficiency within the built environment, driven by global concerns over climate change, has resulted in notable shifts in building energy consumption patterns. Achieving reductions in building energy use and CO₂ emissions through sustainable strategies necessitates the development of country-specific policies. While numerous energy assessment tools are available internationally, they often lack contextual relevance for Uganda and many Sub-Saharan African countries.Therefore, there is a pressing need for a tool tailored to Uganda's distinct climatic conditions. This study aimed to identify key building sustainability indicators to promote energy efficiency in Ugandan buildings. Utilizing the Delphi Technique, experts from academia, construction, energy consulting, and government agencies evaluated 35 building indicators over two assessment rounds. The consensus among experts was validated using the Interrater Agreement, with a significant Kendall's W value exceeding 0.6, rising from 0.655 in the first round to 0.704 in the second. Construction consultants showed the highest W value (0.77) in the second round, followed by energy consultants (0.74), while academicians had the lowest (0.7). The Chi-square test demonstrated strong agreement in ranking indicators across 34 degrees of freedom. The most significant indicators identified include "B20 - Optimization of energy use," "B8 - Advanced design and construction technology," and "B27 - Natural ventilation design," among others. The Delphi Technique was instrumental in achieving expert consensus, while interrater agreement was used to validate and ensure the reliability of the findings. The developed framework provides critical insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers seeking to advance energy efficiency and sustainability within Uganda's built environment.

Results in EngineeringVol. 24
Busitema University (UG), Makerere University (UG)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Delphi Technique in Research
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.