First evidence of ichnopathologies in Rhinoceripeda tasnadyi tracks from the Miocene of Hungary

• We describe the first ichnological record of malformation in rhinocerotid, showing a split digit III hoof. • It’s a very rare occurrence also in the modern record, therefore no precise cause can be identified. • The malformation happened long before the impression as no gait variations are recorded. • Rhinocerotid bones from Eocene and Miocene show less malformation than modern ones, making this finding of higher impact. Despite a vast record, ichnological evidence of malformed or injured animals is extremely rare. During the re-examination of slabs collected from the Ipolytarnóc tracksite (Early Miocene, North Hungary) and housed at the Supervisory Authority for Regulatory Affairs, three “atypical” tracks were detected along the same trackway. They belong to the ichnotaxon Rhinoceripeda tasnadyi , attributed to a medium- to large-sized “hornless” Miocene rhinocerotids. The hoof of the left digit III appears to be split, rather than oval, at approximatively half of its width, giving an almost tetradactyl appearance to the footprints. The deformation due to overprinting is excluded because of the number of tracks showing the same variation. This injury/malformation could be identified as the atypical tracks belong to a trackway where the opposite impression is preserved and due to the large number of accessible R. tasnadyi footprints. These account for a wide range of the standard variability of the morphology at Ipolytarnóc. If the track record was limited, or when the atypical tracks do not belong to a trackway, it would not be possible to recognise those differences as ichnopathologies and, as a result, a different trackmaker would have been assessed, or a wrong ichnotaxonomical diagnosis would have been attributed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geobios
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2024.08.009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geological formations and processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

First evidence of ichnopathologies in Rhinoceripeda tasnadyi tracks from the Miocene of Hungary

Gábor Botfalvai, Luca Pandolfi, Matteo Belvedere, Filippo Bertozzo
2 citations
Geobios
Geological formations and processes
1.03
article

First evidence of ichnopathologies in Rhinoceripeda tasnadyi tracks from the Miocene of Hungary

Gábor Botfalvai, Luca Pandolfi, Matteo Belvedere, Filippo Bertozzo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• We describe the first ichnological record of malformation in rhinocerotid, showing a split digit III hoof. • It’s a very rare occurrence also in the modern record, therefore no precise cause can be identified. • The malformation happened long before the impression as no gait variations are recorded. • Rhinocerotid bones from Eocene and Miocene show less malformation than modern ones, making this finding of higher impact. Despite a vast record, ichnological evidence of malformed or injured animals is extremely rare. During the re-examination of slabs collected from the Ipolytarnóc tracksite (Early Miocene, North Hungary) and housed at the Supervisory Authority for Regulatory Affairs, three “atypical” tracks were detected along the same trackway. They belong to the ichnotaxon Rhinoceripeda tasnadyi , attributed to a medium- to large-sized “hornless” Miocene rhinocerotids. The hoof of the left digit III appears to be split, rather than oval, at approximatively half of its width, giving an almost tetradactyl appearance to the footprints. The deformation due to overprinting is excluded because of the number of tracks showing the same variation. This injury/malformation could be identified as the atypical tracks belong to a trackway where the opposite impression is preserved and due to the large number of accessible R. tasnadyi footprints. These account for a wide range of the standard variability of the morphology at Ipolytarnóc. If the track record was limited, or when the atypical tracks do not belong to a trackway, it would not be possible to recognise those differences as ichnopathologies and, as a result, a different trackmaker would have been assessed, or a wrong ichnotaxonomical diagnosis would have been attributed.

GeobiosVol. 88-89
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), University of Pisa (IT), Institute of Natural Sciences (BE), Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science (HU), Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia (PT), University of Florence (IT)
Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Interreg
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Geological formations and processes
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.