The use of a novel toe–thumb pressure index for assessing arterial status in the lower limb. A reliability and validity study
Thumb systolic pressures are correlated with brachial systolic pressures, with reasonable intra-rater reliability, however, correlation is only fair and measurement error wider than clinically acceptable. Furthermore, manual measures are poorly correlated with automated units. Consequently, caution is required in applying these techniques. As thumb measures were perceived as significantly more comfortable than brachial measures and have an advantage where brachial pressures cannot, or should not, be obtained, further evaluation is warranted.
Authors
- Peta Ellen Tehan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-3023)
- Helen Banwell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5730-1611)
- Greg Anderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1065-6081)
- John Mazzeo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-3692)
- Kristin Graham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1864-1856)
Institutions
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
- Published
- 2024-10-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70011
- Primary Topic
- Peripheral Artery Disease Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of South Australia