The Inbetweeny Collective: Reflexive Dialogues on the Liminality of Researchers' Lived Experiences

In this collaborative autoethnography, we critically explore our lived experiences within a wider context of HCI research and practice. We reflect on the epistemological ways of knowing through ‘insider’ lived experience of, and ‘outsider’ knowledge of our research topic(s) via the concept of “liminal space” as a process ontology. To embrace liminality entails inhabiting the space ‘in-between’ these ways of knowing, suspended on a threshold of uncertainty and transformative growth. All authors identify as ‘inbetweenies’, because we are neither just ‘insiders’ nor ‘outsiders’, and we collect our respective stories to share. Drawing from these stories and our dialogues, we discuss how ways of knowing have historically been dichotomously categorized with their associated subjective or objective characterizations, resulting in power hierarchies and tensions. We propose that for an ‘inbetweeny’ researcher, thoughtful approaches to navigating this liminal space could potentially bridge persistent tensions in HCI research and practices toward personal and systemic transformation. Five areas of reflection are discussed, with proposed learnings that can be applied towards sustained practices for individuals and collectives at any stage of their journey and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3686169.3686204
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Inbetweeny Collective: Reflexive Dialogues on the Liminality of Researchers' Lived Experiences

Denise Quesnel, Sheelagh Carpendale, Bernhard E. Riecke, Tatiana Losev et al.
1 links
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

The Inbetweeny Collective: Reflexive Dialogues on the Liminality of Researchers' Lived Experiences

Denise Quesnel, Sheelagh Carpendale, Bernhard E. Riecke, Tatiana Losev, Ekaterina R. Stepanova
article en

Abstract

In this collaborative autoethnography, we critically explore our lived experiences within a wider context of HCI research and practice. We reflect on the epistemological ways of knowing through ‘insider’ lived experience of, and ‘outsider’ knowledge of our research topic(s) via the concept of “liminal space” as a process ontology. To embrace liminality entails inhabiting the space ‘in-between’ these ways of knowing, suspended on a threshold of uncertainty and transformative growth. All authors identify as ‘inbetweenies’, because we are neither just ‘insiders’ nor ‘outsiders’, and we collect our respective stories to share. Drawing from these stories and our dialogues, we discuss how ways of knowing have historically been dichotomously categorized with their associated subjective or objective characterizations, resulting in power hierarchies and tensions. We propose that for an ‘inbetweeny’ researcher, thoughtful approaches to navigating this liminal space could potentially bridge persistent tensions in HCI research and practices toward personal and systemic transformation. Five areas of reflection are discussed, with proposed learnings that can be applied towards sustained practices for individuals and collectives at any stage of their journey and development.

Simon Fraser University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.