Global Metrics for Terrestrial Biodiversity

Biodiversity metrics are increasingly in demand for informing government, business, and civil society decisions. However, it is not always clear to end users how these metrics differ or for what purpose they are best suited. We seek to answer these questions using a database of 573 biodiversity-related metrics, indicators, indices, and layers, which address aspects of genetic diversity, species, and ecosystems. We provide examples of indicators and their uses within the state–pressure–response–benefits framework that is widely used in conservation science. Considering complementarity across this framework, we recommend a small number of metrics considered most pertinent for use in decision-making by governments and businesses. We conclude by highlighting five future directions: increasing the importance of national metrics, ensuring wider uptake of business metrics, agreeing on a minimum set of metrics for government and business use, automating metric calculation through use of technology, and generating sustainable funding for metric production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-121522-045106
Citations
33
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Metrics for Terrestrial Biodiversity

Frank Hawkins, Heli Sihvonen, Naomi Kingston, Jonathan Green et al.
33 citations
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Species Distribution and Climate Change
29.43
article

Global Metrics for Terrestrial Biodiversity

Frank Hawkins, Heli Sihvonen, Naomi Kingston, Jonathan Green, Nina Bhola, Thomas M. Brooks, Arnout van Soesbergen, Jacob Bedford, América Paz Durán, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Jonathan D. Hughes, Lauren V. Weatherdon, Ana Ramos Rodrigues, Lera Miles, Chris West, Osgur McDermott-Long, Corinna Ravilious, Natasha Ali, Luke Swindell, Alena Cierna, Ayesha Hargey, Neil D. Burgess, Matthew Harris, Sharon E. Brooks, Aimee Seager, Matea Vukelic, Roberto Correa
article en
33 citations

Abstract

Biodiversity metrics are increasingly in demand for informing government, business, and civil society decisions. However, it is not always clear to end users how these metrics differ or for what purpose they are best suited. We seek to answer these questions using a database of 573 biodiversity-related metrics, indicators, indices, and layers, which address aspects of genetic diversity, species, and ecosystems. We provide examples of indicators and their uses within the state–pressure–response–benefits framework that is widely used in conservation science. Considering complementarity across this framework, we recommend a small number of metrics considered most pertinent for use in decision-making by governments and businesses. We conclude by highlighting five future directions: increasing the importance of national metrics, ensuring wider uptake of business metrics, agreeing on a minimum set of metrics for government and business use, automating metric calculation through use of technology, and generating sustainable funding for metric production.

Annual Review of Environment and ResourcesVol. 49(1)
University of the Philippines Los Baños (PH), University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Tasmania (AU), Conservation International (US), Stockholm Environment Institute (GB), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (GB), Austral University of Chile (CL), University of Cambridge (GB), BirdLife international (GB), International Union for Conservation of Nature (CH), University of York (GB), KPMG (United Kingdom) (GB)
Stockholm Environment Institute, UK Research and Innovation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
29.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.