Magnitude Clustering During Stick‐Slip Dynamics on Laboratory Faults

Abstract We present an analysis of magnitude clustering of microfractures inferred from acoustic emissions (AEs) during stick‐slip (SS) dynamics of faulted Westerly granite samples in frictional sliding experiments, with and without fluids, under triaxial loading with constant displacement rate. We investigate magnitude clustering in time across periods during, preceding and after macroscopic slip events on laboratory faults. Our findings reveal that magnitude clustering exists such that subsequent AEs tend to have more similar magnitudes than expected. Yet, this clustering only exists during macroscopic slip events and is strongest during major slip events in fluid‐saturated and dry samples. We demonstrate that robust magnitude clustering arises from variations in frequency‐magnitude distributions of AE events during macroscopic slip events. These temporal variations indicate a prevalence of larger AE events right after (0.3–3 s) the SS onset. Hence, magnitude clustering is a consequence of non‐stationarities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl109865
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnitude Clustering During Stick‐Slip Dynamics on Laboratory Faults

Thomas Goebel, Georg Dresen, Omid Khajehdehi, Jörn Davidsen
Geophysical Research Letters
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Magnitude Clustering During Stick‐Slip Dynamics on Laboratory Faults

Thomas Goebel, Georg Dresen, Omid Khajehdehi, Jörn Davidsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract We present an analysis of magnitude clustering of microfractures inferred from acoustic emissions (AEs) during stick‐slip (SS) dynamics of faulted Westerly granite samples in frictional sliding experiments, with and without fluids, under triaxial loading with constant displacement rate. We investigate magnitude clustering in time across periods during, preceding and after macroscopic slip events on laboratory faults. Our findings reveal that magnitude clustering exists such that subsequent AEs tend to have more similar magnitudes than expected. Yet, this clustering only exists during macroscopic slip events and is strongest during major slip events in fluid‐saturated and dry samples. We demonstrate that robust magnitude clustering arises from variations in frequency‐magnitude distributions of AE events during macroscopic slip events. These temporal variations indicate a prevalence of larger AE events right after (0.3–3 s) the SS onset. Hence, magnitude clustering is a consequence of non‐stationarities.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 51(20)
University of Calgary (CA), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Hotchkiss Brain Institute (CA), University of Memphis (US)
National Science Foundation, Alberta Innovates, U.S. Geological Survey, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Magnitude Clustering During Stick‐Slip Dynamics on Laboratory Faults — Thomas Goebel, Georg Dresen, et al. · Geophysical Research Letters (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS