Everyday Constructions of Class-Based Inequality: Field Effects in UK Museum Work

This article contributes to our understanding of how occupational contexts shape everyday constructions of class-based inequality. Using Bourdieu’s concept of field, and UK museum work as a case, we analyse interview, focus group and secondary data. We show how those with a stake in museum work construct three versions of class-based inequality: (1) between individuals; (2) between positions; and (3) between institution and worker. The museum field provides a familiar space that can aid ‘recognition’ of inequality between individuals. Conversely the field generates a logic – here, keeping collections special – which can legitimate structural inequality between positions. It also facilitates a game-playing dynamic that leads to a ‘pragmatic acceptance’ and reinforcement of inequality between institution and worker. Visibility of class-based inequality is shaped by misdirection rather than misrecognition, as well as one’s position in the hierarchy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385241289729
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Everyday Constructions of Class-Based Inequality: Field Effects in UK Museum Work

Rebecca Whiting, Samantha Evans
Sociology
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

Everyday Constructions of Class-Based Inequality: Field Effects in UK Museum Work

Rebecca Whiting, Samantha Evans
article en

Abstract

This article contributes to our understanding of how occupational contexts shape everyday constructions of class-based inequality. Using Bourdieu’s concept of field, and UK museum work as a case, we analyse interview, focus group and secondary data. We show how those with a stake in museum work construct three versions of class-based inequality: (1) between individuals; (2) between positions; and (3) between institution and worker. The museum field provides a familiar space that can aid ‘recognition’ of inequality between individuals. Conversely the field generates a logic – here, keeping collections special – which can legitimate structural inequality between positions. It also facilitates a game-playing dynamic that leads to a ‘pragmatic acceptance’ and reinforcement of inequality between institution and worker. Visibility of class-based inequality is shaped by misdirection rather than misrecognition, as well as one’s position in the hierarchy.

SociologyVol. 59(2)
Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.