Streptokinase or Alteplase for Acute Limb Ischemia? A Meta-Analysis

Background: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a vascular emergency that necessitates prompt and effective treatment to restore blood flow and prevent limb loss. Thrombolytic therapy, particularly with agents like streptokinase and alteplase, plays a pivotal role in ALI management. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of streptokinase and alteplase in treating ALI. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted up to August 13, 2024, to identify relevant studies. The inclusion criteria encompassed clinical trials involving patients diagnosed with ALI who received either streptokinase or alteplase as the initial thrombolytic treatment. The quality of the included studies was rigorously assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINOR) criteria. A meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The final analysis included 20 studies, encompassing both qualitative and quantitative assessments. A comparative analysis of streptokinase and alteplase for limb salvage at 30 days revealed a significant advantage in favor of alteplase, with a relative risk ratio (RR) of 0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.88, I² = 0%). Furthermore, streptokinase was associated with a higher rate of primary amputation, with an RR of 2.54 (95% CI 1.50-4.32, I² = 0%) compared to alteplase. The use of streptokinase also correlated with a higher risk of complications, including major bleeding (RR 1.75, 95% CI 0.04-84.30, I² = 77%) and minor bleeding (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.60-3.32, I² = 0%). Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis underscore the superior efficacy of alteplase in achieving limb salvage in ALI, coupled with a more favorable safety profile. The preferential use of alteplase in clinical practice is recommended, particularly in patients with severe ischemia. However, careful patient selection and close monitoring are crucial when streptokinase therapy is considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v9i1.1162
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Streptokinase or Alteplase for Acute Limb Ischemia? A Meta-Analysis

Agung Pradnyana Suwirya, Nikhil Pande, Bagus Ari Pradnyana DS
Bioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Streptokinase or Alteplase for Acute Limb Ischemia? A Meta-Analysis

Agung Pradnyana Suwirya, Nikhil Pande, Bagus Ari Pradnyana DS
article en

Abstract

Background: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a vascular emergency that necessitates prompt and effective treatment to restore blood flow and prevent limb loss. Thrombolytic therapy, particularly with agents like streptokinase and alteplase, plays a pivotal role in ALI management. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of streptokinase and alteplase in treating ALI. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted up to August 13, 2024, to identify relevant studies. The inclusion criteria encompassed clinical trials involving patients diagnosed with ALI who received either streptokinase or alteplase as the initial thrombolytic treatment. The quality of the included studies was rigorously assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINOR) criteria. A meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The final analysis included 20 studies, encompassing both qualitative and quantitative assessments. A comparative analysis of streptokinase and alteplase for limb salvage at 30 days revealed a significant advantage in favor of alteplase, with a relative risk ratio (RR) of 0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.88, I² = 0%). Furthermore, streptokinase was associated with a higher rate of primary amputation, with an RR of 2.54 (95% CI 1.50-4.32, I² = 0%) compared to alteplase. The use of streptokinase also correlated with a higher risk of complications, including major bleeding (RR 1.75, 95% CI 0.04-84.30, I² = 77%) and minor bleeding (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.60-3.32, I² = 0%). Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis underscore the superior efficacy of alteplase in achieving limb salvage in ALI, coupled with a more favorable safety profile. The preferential use of alteplase in clinical practice is recommended, particularly in patients with severe ischemia. However, careful patient selection and close monitoring are crucial when streptokinase therapy is considered.

Bioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational ResearchVol. 9(1)
Udayana University (ID)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.