Mengzian knowledge practicalism

I argue that, for Mengzi, the kind of knowledge that features in expressions of the form ‘knowing N’, where N is a noun or a noun phrase, is not a kind of belief but is instead a capacity for intelligently performing relevant actions. My argument proceeds by showing that, first, Mengzi is committed to the view that a person knows N iff she is relevantly capable and, second, that the best explanation for this is that the kind of knowledge involved in knowing N is a capacity. Finally, I motivate such a practicalist interpretation by arguing that it offers us a general but informative explanation of what it is that knowing N makes the knower capable of doing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2024.2407033
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mengzian knowledge practicalism

Waldemar Brys
2 citations
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Indian and Buddhist Studies
16.78
article

Mengzian knowledge practicalism

Waldemar Brys
article en
2 citations

Abstract

I argue that, for Mengzi, the kind of knowledge that features in expressions of the form ‘knowing N’, where N is a noun or a noun phrase, is not a kind of belief but is instead a capacity for intelligently performing relevant actions. My argument proceeds by showing that, first, Mengzi is committed to the view that a person knows N iff she is relevantly capable and, second, that the best explanation for this is that the kind of knowledge involved in knowing N is a capacity. Finally, I motivate such a practicalist interpretation by arguing that it offers us a general but informative explanation of what it is that knowing N makes the knower capable of doing.

British Journal for the History of PhilosophyVol. 33(6)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
16.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.