A comparative analysis of the results of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies and segmentectomies in patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

Objective. To improve the results of surgical treatment of patients with stage IA NSCLC requiring thoracoscopic anatomical resections. Material and methods. One surgical team performed 132 thoracoscopic lobectomies and segmentectomies in one hospital between 2010 and 2020. This study was consecutive, non-randomized and retrospective. Patients after thoracoscopic lobectomies and segmentectomies for stage IA NSCLC were compared. Additionally, an analysis was performed in 4 subgroups of patients: lobectomy (n=45) and segmentectomy (n=21) with a tumor size up to 2 cm; lobectomy (n=55) and segmentectomy (n=11) with a tumor size from 2 to 3 cm. Results. The comparison groups are comparable in main clinical parameters. There was no mortality in both groups. There were no differences in the postoperative hospital day (6.0 and 6.2 days, p=0.58), the number of removed lymph nodes (9.2 and 9.9, p=0.52) and the percentage of complications (15.6% and 21.9%, p=0.75) when comparing segmentectomies and lobectomies. Differences in the groups were revealed in the length of the machine stitch: in lobectomy — 218.5 mm, in segmentectomy — 309.8 mm (p=0.0001). This pattern was the same in the subgroup analysis. In patients with a tumor from 2 to 3 cm, when removing a segment, the size of the mini-access was smaller than during lobectomy (3.3 cm and 4.0 cm, p=0.0087), and the persistent air leak was longer (6.8 and 2.9 days, p=0.0332). When analyzing long-term outcomes, no significant differences were found either in both group and subgroup analysis; however, there was a tendency towards an increase the overall five-year survival after segmentectomies compared with lobectomies in patients with tumor size ≤2 cm, while with tumor size from 2 to 3 cm, on the contrary, the best long-term results were found in patients operated on with thoracoscopic lobectomy. Conclusion. Thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy are safe and effective for stage IA NSCLC; the short-term outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with stage IA NSCLC after thoracoscopic lob- and segmentectomies with tumor size ≤2 cm are not significantly different; in patients with the tumor size from 2 to 3 cm, the persistent air leak after segmentectomies was significantly higher than after lobectomies (p=0.033); when evaluating long-term outcomes, no significant differences were found between the study groups and subgroups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Case in Oncology
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62546/3034-1477-2024-2-2-7-21
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of the results of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies and segmentectomies in patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

E. I. Zinchenko, А. И. Коваленко, Vadim Pischik, Petrov As et al.
Clinical Case in Oncology
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

A comparative analysis of the results of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies and segmentectomies in patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

E. I. Zinchenko, А. И. Коваленко, Vadim Pischik, Petrov As, D. L. Fateeva
article en

Abstract

Objective. To improve the results of surgical treatment of patients with stage IA NSCLC requiring thoracoscopic anatomical resections. Material and methods. One surgical team performed 132 thoracoscopic lobectomies and segmentectomies in one hospital between 2010 and 2020. This study was consecutive, non-randomized and retrospective. Patients after thoracoscopic lobectomies and segmentectomies for stage IA NSCLC were compared. Additionally, an analysis was performed in 4 subgroups of patients: lobectomy (n=45) and segmentectomy (n=21) with a tumor size up to 2 cm; lobectomy (n=55) and segmentectomy (n=11) with a tumor size from 2 to 3 cm. Results. The comparison groups are comparable in main clinical parameters. There was no mortality in both groups. There were no differences in the postoperative hospital day (6.0 and 6.2 days, p=0.58), the number of removed lymph nodes (9.2 and 9.9, p=0.52) and the percentage of complications (15.6% and 21.9%, p=0.75) when comparing segmentectomies and lobectomies. Differences in the groups were revealed in the length of the machine stitch: in lobectomy — 218.5 mm, in segmentectomy — 309.8 mm (p=0.0001). This pattern was the same in the subgroup analysis. In patients with a tumor from 2 to 3 cm, when removing a segment, the size of the mini-access was smaller than during lobectomy (3.3 cm and 4.0 cm, p=0.0087), and the persistent air leak was longer (6.8 and 2.9 days, p=0.0332). When analyzing long-term outcomes, no significant differences were found either in both group and subgroup analysis; however, there was a tendency towards an increase the overall five-year survival after segmentectomies compared with lobectomies in patients with tumor size ≤2 cm, while with tumor size from 2 to 3 cm, on the contrary, the best long-term results were found in patients operated on with thoracoscopic lobectomy. Conclusion. Thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy are safe and effective for stage IA NSCLC; the short-term outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with stage IA NSCLC after thoracoscopic lob- and segmentectomies with tumor size ≤2 cm are not significantly different; in patients with the tumor size from 2 to 3 cm, the persistent air leak after segmentectomies was significantly higher than after lobectomies (p=0.033); when evaluating long-term outcomes, no significant differences were found between the study groups and subgroups.

Clinical Case in OncologyVol. 2(2)
St Petersburg University (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.