Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gliomas: Assessment of Preanalytical Variables

Precision oncology is driven by biomarkers. For glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common malignant adult primary brain tumor, O<sup>6</sup>-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation is an important prognostic and treatment clinical biomarker. Time-consuming preanalytical steps such as biospecimen storage, fixation, sampling, and processing are sources of data irreproducibility, and all these preanalytical variables are confounded by intratumor heterogeneity of MGMT promoter methylation. To assess the effect of preanalytical variables on GBM DNA methylation, tissue storage/sampling (CryoGrid), sample preparation multisonicator (PIXUL), and 5-methylcytosine DNA immunoprecipitation (Matrix-MeDIP-qPCR/seq) platforms were used. MGMT promoter methylation status assayed by MeDIP-qPCR was validated with methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. MGMT promoter methylation levels in frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sample pairs were not statistically different, confirming the reliability of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded for MGMT promoter methylation analysis. Warm ex vivo ischemia (up to 4 hours at 37 °C) and 3 cycles of repeated sample thawing and freezing did not statistically impact 5-methylcytosine at MGMT promoter, exon, and enhancer regions, indicating the resistance of DNA methylation to common variations in sample processing conditions that might be encountered in research and clinical settings. Twenty-six percent to 34% of specimens exhibited intratumor heterogeneity in the MGMT DNA promoter methylation. These data demonstrate that variations in sample fixation, ischemia duration and temperature, and DNA methylation assay technique do not have a statistically significant impact on MGMT promoter methylation assessment. However, intratumor methylation heterogeneity underscores the value of multiple biopsies at different GBM geographic tumor sites in the evaluation of MGMT promoter methylation status. Matrix-MeDIP-seq analysis revealed that MGMT promoter methylation status clustered with other differentially methylated genomic loci (eg, HOXA and lncRNAs) that are resilient to variation in the above preanalytical conditions. These observations offer new opportunities to develop more granular data-based epigenetic GBM biomarkers. In this regard, the high-throughput CryoGrid-PIXUL-Matrix toolbox could be useful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Investigation
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labinv.2024.102160
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gliomas: Assessment of Preanalytical Variables

Rohan Ramakrishna, Jennifer Delegard, Karol Bomsztyk, Nitin Tandon et al.
6 citations
Laboratory Investigation
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
1.71
article

Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gliomas: Assessment of Preanalytical Variables

Rohan Ramakrishna, Jennifer Delegard, Karol Bomsztyk, Nitin Tandon, Anoop P. Patel, Daniel Mar, Monika Vishnoi, Robert Rostomily, Akash J. Patel, Caroline Hadley, Zheng Yin, Oleg Denisenko, Richard G. Ellenbogen, Suzanne Z. Powell
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Precision oncology is driven by biomarkers. For glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common malignant adult primary brain tumor, O<sup>6</sup>-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation is an important prognostic and treatment clinical biomarker. Time-consuming preanalytical steps such as biospecimen storage, fixation, sampling, and processing are sources of data irreproducibility, and all these preanalytical variables are confounded by intratumor heterogeneity of MGMT promoter methylation. To assess the effect of preanalytical variables on GBM DNA methylation, tissue storage/sampling (CryoGrid), sample preparation multisonicator (PIXUL), and 5-methylcytosine DNA immunoprecipitation (Matrix-MeDIP-qPCR/seq) platforms were used. MGMT promoter methylation status assayed by MeDIP-qPCR was validated with methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. MGMT promoter methylation levels in frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sample pairs were not statistically different, confirming the reliability of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded for MGMT promoter methylation analysis. Warm ex vivo ischemia (up to 4 hours at 37 °C) and 3 cycles of repeated sample thawing and freezing did not statistically impact 5-methylcytosine at MGMT promoter, exon, and enhancer regions, indicating the resistance of DNA methylation to common variations in sample processing conditions that might be encountered in research and clinical settings. Twenty-six percent to 34% of specimens exhibited intratumor heterogeneity in the MGMT DNA promoter methylation. These data demonstrate that variations in sample fixation, ischemia duration and temperature, and DNA methylation assay technique do not have a statistically significant impact on MGMT promoter methylation assessment. However, intratumor methylation heterogeneity underscores the value of multiple biopsies at different GBM geographic tumor sites in the evaluation of MGMT promoter methylation status. Matrix-MeDIP-seq analysis revealed that MGMT promoter methylation status clustered with other differentially methylated genomic loci (eg, HOXA and lncRNAs) that are resilient to variation in the above preanalytical conditions. These observations offer new opportunities to develop more granular data-based epigenetic GBM biomarkers. In this regard, the high-throughput CryoGrid-PIXUL-Matrix toolbox could be useful.

Laboratory InvestigationVol. 104(12)
Houston Methodist (US), University of New Mexico (US), Duke University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Washington (US), Cornell University (US), Methodist Hospital (US), University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory (US), Neurological Surgery (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), The Neurological Institute (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.