The accordion technique did not improve bone healing in a mouse model of distraction osteogenesis

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a valuable surgical method for limb lengthening and bone defect correction, but its lengthy consolidation phase presents challenges. The accordion technique (AT), involving compression and distraction of bone segments, has shown potential for enhancing healing. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the AT conducted at three different time points (distraction phase, early consolidation phase, or late consolidation phase) compared to conventional DO in a mouse osteotomy model. Healing was evaluated using in vivo microCT, histology, and computational modeling. Results showed that bridging frequency, BV, and callus tissue composition were similar between conventional DO and late consolidation AT. In contrast, distraction phase AT led to delayed healing at day 15 with a 72% reduction in BV compared to DO, but no significant differences by the endpoint. Early consolidation AT showed significantly impaired healing compared to DO, with only 29% of mice achieving bony bridging, and significantly reduced bone marrow area of the endpoint callus. In silico modeling was generally predictive of in vivo findings and suggested that application of the AT during early consolidation results in destruction of newly-formed vascular tissue. Overall, no benefit was observed for the AT compared to conventional DO with the parameters employed in this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71335-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The accordion technique did not improve bone healing in a mouse model of distraction osteogenesis

Isabelle Villemure, Kyle Kavaseri, Frank Rauch, Ruisen Fu et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Bone fractures and treatments
0.77
article

The accordion technique did not improve bone healing in a mouse model of distraction osteogenesis

Isabelle Villemure, Kyle Kavaseri, Frank Rauch, Ruisen Fu, David Bertrand, Bettina M. Willie, Reggie C. Hamdy, Haisheng Yang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a valuable surgical method for limb lengthening and bone defect correction, but its lengthy consolidation phase presents challenges. The accordion technique (AT), involving compression and distraction of bone segments, has shown potential for enhancing healing. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the AT conducted at three different time points (distraction phase, early consolidation phase, or late consolidation phase) compared to conventional DO in a mouse osteotomy model. Healing was evaluated using in vivo microCT, histology, and computational modeling. Results showed that bridging frequency, BV, and callus tissue composition were similar between conventional DO and late consolidation AT. In contrast, distraction phase AT led to delayed healing at day 15 with a 72% reduction in BV compared to DO, but no significant differences by the endpoint. Early consolidation AT showed significantly impaired healing compared to DO, with only 29% of mice achieving bony bridging, and significantly reduced bone marrow area of the endpoint callus. In silico modeling was generally predictive of in vivo findings and suggested that application of the AT during early consolidation results in destruction of newly-formed vascular tissue. Overall, no benefit was observed for the AT compared to conventional DO with the parameters employed in this study.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Shriners Hospitals for Children - Canada (CA), Beijing University of Technology (CN), Polytechnique Montréal (CA), McGill University (CA)
Shriners Hospitals for Children, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Bone fractures and treatments
0.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.