The Direct Impact Effect of Different Foot Orthotic Designs on the Plantar Loading of Patients with Structural Hallux Limitus: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Background: This study examines the effect of two types of custom-made foot orthoses (CFOs) in patients with structural hallux limitus (SHL). Methods: In this quasi-experimental, repeated measures study, 24 participants with SHL were sampled. Two CFOs—cut-out CFO and anterior stabilizer element (AFSE) CFO—were compared using minimalist SAGURO neoprene shoes: no foot orthoses (FO), cut-out CFO, and AFSE CFO. Plantar pressures and center of pressure (CoP) displacement were measured using a Podoprint® platform. Results: Both CFOs shifted the CoP medially during midstance (p < 0.001 with AFSE CFO and p = 0.0036 with cut-out CFO). The AFSE CFO showed a more anterior CoP in midstance, while the cut-out CFO affected anterior CoP in midstance and pre-swing. The AFSE CFO significantly increased pressure in the second toe, lesser metatarsal heads (MTH), midfoot, and rearfoot. In contrast, the cut-out CFO decreased pressure in the second MTH and lesser toe regions, increasing pressure in the midfoot and heel. Both CFOs lowered the hallux/first MTH ratio compared to shod without CFO. Conclusions: The cut-out CFO led to medial and anterior CoP displacement, reducing lateral foot and hallux pressure while transferring loads to the first MTH. The AFSE CFO caused a similar shift by increasing loads on the first MTH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209510
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Direct Impact Effect of Different Foot Orthotic Designs on the Plantar Loading of Patients with Structural Hallux Limitus: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Luis E. Roche-Seruendo, Enrique Sanchis-Sales, Magdalena Martínez-Rico, Ana Belén Ortega‐Ávila et al.
Applied Sciences
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

The Direct Impact Effect of Different Foot Orthotic Designs on the Plantar Loading of Patients with Structural Hallux Limitus: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Luis E. Roche-Seruendo, Enrique Sanchis-Sales, Magdalena Martínez-Rico, Ana Belén Ortega‐Ávila, Kevin Deschamps, Gabriel Gijón-Noguerón, Ana Climent-Pedrosa
article en

Abstract

Background: This study examines the effect of two types of custom-made foot orthoses (CFOs) in patients with structural hallux limitus (SHL). Methods: In this quasi-experimental, repeated measures study, 24 participants with SHL were sampled. Two CFOs—cut-out CFO and anterior stabilizer element (AFSE) CFO—were compared using minimalist SAGURO neoprene shoes: no foot orthoses (FO), cut-out CFO, and AFSE CFO. Plantar pressures and center of pressure (CoP) displacement were measured using a Podoprint® platform. Results: Both CFOs shifted the CoP medially during midstance (p < 0.001 with AFSE CFO and p = 0.0036 with cut-out CFO). The AFSE CFO showed a more anterior CoP in midstance, while the cut-out CFO affected anterior CoP in midstance and pre-swing. The AFSE CFO significantly increased pressure in the second toe, lesser metatarsal heads (MTH), midfoot, and rearfoot. In contrast, the cut-out CFO decreased pressure in the second MTH and lesser toe regions, increasing pressure in the midfoot and heel. Both CFOs lowered the hallux/first MTH ratio compared to shod without CFO. Conclusions: The cut-out CFO led to medial and anterior CoP displacement, reducing lateral foot and hallux pressure while transferring loads to the first MTH. The AFSE CFO caused a similar shift by increasing loads on the first MTH.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(20)
Universitat de València (ES), Universidad San Jorge (ES), Haute École Léonard de Vinci (BE), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.