Online Action Detection Incorporating an Additional Action Classifier

Most online action detection methods focus on solving a (K + 1) classification problem, where the additional category represents the ‘background’ class. However, training on the ‘background’ class and managing data imbalance are common challenges in online action detection. To address these issues, we propose a framework for online action detection by incorporating an additional pathway between the feature extractor and online action detection model. Specifically, we present one configuration that retains feature distinctions for fusion with the final decision from the Long Short-Term Transformer (LSTR), enhancing its performance in the (K + 1) classification. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves an accuracy of 71.2% in mean Average Precision (mAP) on the Thumos14 dataset, outperforming the 69.5% achieved by the original LSTR method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13204110
Primary Topic
Human Pose and Action Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online Action Detection Incorporating an Additional Action Classifier

Shao-Kang Huang, Yin-Tien Wang, Chen‐Chien Hsu, Min-Hang Hsu et al.
Electronics
Human Pose and Action Recognition
article

Online Action Detection Incorporating an Additional Action Classifier

Shao-Kang Huang, Yin-Tien Wang, Chen‐Chien Hsu, Min-Hang Hsu, Yi-Hsing Chien
article en

Abstract

Most online action detection methods focus on solving a (K + 1) classification problem, where the additional category represents the ‘background’ class. However, training on the ‘background’ class and managing data imbalance are common challenges in online action detection. To address these issues, we propose a framework for online action detection by incorporating an additional pathway between the feature extractor and online action detection model. Specifically, we present one configuration that retains feature distinctions for fusion with the final decision from the Long Short-Term Transformer (LSTR), enhancing its performance in the (K + 1) classification. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves an accuracy of 71.2% in mean Average Precision (mAP) on the Thumos14 dataset, outperforming the 69.5% achieved by the original LSTR method.

ElectronicsVol. 13(20)
Tamkang University (TW), National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
Ministry of Education, India, National Taiwan Normal University, National Science and Technology Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Human Pose and Action Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.