Az anyanyelv használatának joga és annak érvényesülése a magyar büntetőeljárásokban

Aim: The goal of this study is to review Hungarian and international legal instruments in order to assess the relevant standards in this field. Enacting proper legal regulations, however, does not necessarily mean that the requirements of language assistance are also enforced in practice. Another goal, therefore, is the review of the relevant caselaw. Methodology: This study reviews the relevant standards through the review of the relevant Hungarian legal regulations, as well as of the applicable human rights and EU legal instruments. The practical enforcement of the right to language assistance is analysed through the caselaw of the Hungarian Constitutional Court and regular courts. Findings: The present Hungarian Criminal procedure code defines the right to language assistance and the use of translator and interpreter in details. The European Convention on Human Rights and the relevant Directive of the EU also regulate this right. After examining the relevant legal standards it becomes apparent that the present Hungarian legal regime provides more rights and offers a higher level of protection than what is required by the European standards. The consistent jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court considers the right to use mother tongue a crucial element of the equality of arms, an essential part of the right to fair trial. The caselaw of courts show that though there are some cases in which appeals also concern the use of mother tongue, the vast majority of these claims are not relevant for the merits of the case. Value: The right to translation and interpretation is one of the main principles of criminal procedure. The right to language assistance is crucial for ensuring fair trial. In summary, the enforcement of the right to use one’s mother tongue meets the standards provided for in legal regulations and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, but in this field continuous analysis is required in order to ensure compliance at all times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Belügyi Szemle
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38146/bsz-ajia.2024.v72.i10.pp1879-1896
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Az anyanyelv használatának joga és annak érvényesülése a magyar büntetőeljárásokban

Szilvia Dobrocsi
Belügyi Szemle
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Az anyanyelv használatának joga és annak érvényesülése a magyar büntetőeljárásokban

Szilvia Dobrocsi
article en

Abstract

Aim: The goal of this study is to review Hungarian and international legal instruments in order to assess the relevant standards in this field. Enacting proper legal regulations, however, does not necessarily mean that the requirements of language assistance are also enforced in practice. Another goal, therefore, is the review of the relevant caselaw. Methodology: This study reviews the relevant standards through the review of the relevant Hungarian legal regulations, as well as of the applicable human rights and EU legal instruments. The practical enforcement of the right to language assistance is analysed through the caselaw of the Hungarian Constitutional Court and regular courts. Findings: The present Hungarian Criminal procedure code defines the right to language assistance and the use of translator and interpreter in details. The European Convention on Human Rights and the relevant Directive of the EU also regulate this right. After examining the relevant legal standards it becomes apparent that the present Hungarian legal regime provides more rights and offers a higher level of protection than what is required by the European standards. The consistent jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court considers the right to use mother tongue a crucial element of the equality of arms, an essential part of the right to fair trial. The caselaw of courts show that though there are some cases in which appeals also concern the use of mother tongue, the vast majority of these claims are not relevant for the merits of the case. Value: The right to translation and interpretation is one of the main principles of criminal procedure. The right to language assistance is crucial for ensuring fair trial. In summary, the enforcement of the right to use one’s mother tongue meets the standards provided for in legal regulations and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, but in this field continuous analysis is required in order to ensure compliance at all times.

Belügyi SzemleVol. 72(10)
Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary (HU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.