The interrelation of cardiometabolic risk factors and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease subtypes

Introduction. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is one of the leading causes of cirrhosis, liver cancer and extrahepatic complications. The number and various combinations of cardiometabolic risk factors, as well as the severity of liver steatosis, can affect the aggressiveness and prognosis of the disease. The article presents the results of own studies aimed at determining the prognostic significance of risk factors (individual and in different combinations) and steatometry. Objective. To determine the influence of individual cardiometabolic factors, their number and various combinations on the aggressiveness and prognosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; to assess the prognostic value of steatometry for the disease. Material and methods. The examination results (steatometry, blood biochemistry tests, abdominal ultrasound) of patients diagnosed with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis: Student's t-test, Pearson's χ 2-test, odds ratio, relative risk, Fisher's φ -test, ROC-analysis. Results. 146 patients were included. Cohort characteristics: average age 49.3 years, 84 men (57.5%). Aggressive forms (steatohepatitis, advanced steatosis) were associated with arterial hypertension, carbohydrate metabolism disorders (the most significant is insulin resistance), dyslipidemia, hyperuricemia. The severity of liver steatosis was less in patients who received therapy for lipid metabolism disorders comparing with those who didn’t. The presence of three or more cardiometabolic risk factors in a patient increased the risk of steatohepatitis and advanced steatosis. The combination of arterial hypertension and hyperuricemia significantly increased the risk of steatohepatitis. Advanced hepatic steatosis (≥310 dB/m2 by steatometry) was reliably associated with steatohepatitis. Conclusion. Individual risk factors, their number and combinations, contribute differently to the development of aggressive forms of the disease. Hyperuricemia should be considered as an additional cardiometabolic risk factor. Steatometry is capable of identifying advanced hepatic steatosis, being a risk factor for the development of steatohepatitis, which allows us to recommend it for the early diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-447
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The interrelation of cardiometabolic risk factors and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease subtypes

Игорь Геннадьевич Бакулин, A. Yu. Ishchenko, M. Yu. Galushko
1 citations
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
0.39
article

The interrelation of cardiometabolic risk factors and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease subtypes

Игорь Геннадьевич Бакулин, A. Yu. Ishchenko, M. Yu. Galushko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is one of the leading causes of cirrhosis, liver cancer and extrahepatic complications. The number and various combinations of cardiometabolic risk factors, as well as the severity of liver steatosis, can affect the aggressiveness and prognosis of the disease. The article presents the results of own studies aimed at determining the prognostic significance of risk factors (individual and in different combinations) and steatometry. Objective. To determine the influence of individual cardiometabolic factors, their number and various combinations on the aggressiveness and prognosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; to assess the prognostic value of steatometry for the disease. Material and methods. The examination results (steatometry, blood biochemistry tests, abdominal ultrasound) of patients diagnosed with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis: Student's t-test, Pearson's χ 2-test, odds ratio, relative risk, Fisher's φ -test, ROC-analysis. Results. 146 patients were included. Cohort characteristics: average age 49.3 years, 84 men (57.5%). Aggressive forms (steatohepatitis, advanced steatosis) were associated with arterial hypertension, carbohydrate metabolism disorders (the most significant is insulin resistance), dyslipidemia, hyperuricemia. The severity of liver steatosis was less in patients who received therapy for lipid metabolism disorders comparing with those who didn’t. The presence of three or more cardiometabolic risk factors in a patient increased the risk of steatohepatitis and advanced steatosis. The combination of arterial hypertension and hyperuricemia significantly increased the risk of steatohepatitis. Advanced hepatic steatosis (≥310 dB/m2 by steatometry) was reliably associated with steatohepatitis. Conclusion. Individual risk factors, their number and combinations, contribute differently to the development of aggressive forms of the disease. Hyperuricemia should be considered as an additional cardiometabolic risk factor. Steatometry is capable of identifying advanced hepatic steatosis, being a risk factor for the development of steatohepatitis, which allows us to recommend it for the early diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council(15)
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.