The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities

The global network of protected areas has rapidly expanded in the past decade and is expected to cover at least 30% of land and sea by 2030 to halt biodiversity erosion. Yet, the distribution of protected areas is highly heterogeneous on Earth and the social-environmental preconditions enabling or hindering protected area establishment remain poorly understood. Here, using fourteen socioeconomic and environmental factors, we characterize the multidimensional niche of terrestrial and marine protected areas, which we use to accurately establish, at the global scale, whether a particular location has preconditions favourable for paestablishment. We reveal that protected areas, particularly the most restrictive ones, over-aggregate where human development and the number of non-governmental organizations are high. Based on the spatial distribution of vertebrates and the likelihood to convert non-protected areas into strictly protected areas, we identify 'potential' versus 'unrealistic' conservation gains on land and sea, which we define as areas of high vertebrate diversity that are, respectively, favourable and unfavourable to protected area establishment. Where protected areas are unrealistic, alternative strategies such as other effective area-based conservation measures or privately protected areas, could deliver conservation outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53241-1
Citations
29
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities

Nicolas Mouquet, Nicolas Casajus, Camille P. Albouy, Ana Nuño et al.
29 citations
Nature Communications
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
13.31
article

The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities

Nicolas Mouquet, Nicolas Casajus, Camille P. Albouy, Ana Nuño, Laure Velez, Louise M. J. O’Connor, Raphaël Seguin, Joachim Claudet, Rodolphe Devillers, Jessica Jane Meeuwig, Nicolas Loiseau, Tom B. Letessier, David Mouillot, Julien Renaud, Valériano Parravicini, Marc Troussellier, Laura Mannocci, Stéphanie Manel, Vincent Delbar, Wilfried Thuiller
article en
29 citations

Abstract

The global network of protected areas has rapidly expanded in the past decade and is expected to cover at least 30% of land and sea by 2030 to halt biodiversity erosion. Yet, the distribution of protected areas is highly heterogeneous on Earth and the social-environmental preconditions enabling or hindering protected area establishment remain poorly understood. Here, using fourteen socioeconomic and environmental factors, we characterize the multidimensional niche of terrestrial and marine protected areas, which we use to accurately establish, at the global scale, whether a particular location has preconditions favourable for paestablishment. We reveal that protected areas, particularly the most restrictive ones, over-aggregate where human development and the number of non-governmental organizations are high. Based on the spatial distribution of vertebrates and the likelihood to convert non-protected areas into strictly protected areas, we identify 'potential' versus 'unrealistic' conservation gains on land and sea, which we define as areas of high vertebrate diversity that are, respectively, favourable and unfavourable to protected area establishment. Where protected areas are unrealistic, alternative strategies such as other effective area-based conservation measures or privately protected areas, could deliver conservation outcomes.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 15(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Zoological Society of London (GB), Université de Perpignan (FR), Ifremer (FR), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), The University of Western Australia (AU), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), University of Exeter (GB), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier (FR), Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (FR), Services déconcentrés d'appui à la recherche Occitanie-Montpellier (FR), Marine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT), University of Plymouth (GB), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
National Science Foundation, Fondation Bertarelli, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversite
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
13.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.