Late modern war and the <i>geos</i> : The ecological ‘beforemaths’ of advanced military technologies

This article develops the idea that late modern war's relationship with the <i>geos</i> (the ground and the life it sustains) is doubly destructive. While part of this is recognized in a recent focus on slow violence and ecological aftermaths, there is little consideration of the 'beforemath', or the sites of extraction that make advanced military technologies possible. Drawing attention to mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the article connects military technologies to arms manufacturers and their use of extracted minerals (e.g. cobalt, tantalum, copper, uranium). Shared patterns of environmental and public health effects across parts of Iraq, Gaza and the DRC indicate the doubly destructive nature of late modern war's relationship with the <i>geos</i>: toxic materials threaten life <i>after</i> war as the deposits of bombardment and <i>before</i> war as mineral commodities at the beginning of arms supply chains. The article explicates how a perspective from the beforemath radically refigures the ways we think about war and spatiality, temporality, and the range of bodies affected in ways that promise a fuller understanding of the violence distributed by practices of late modern war.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Security Dialogue
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106241265636
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Late modern war and the geos : The ecological ‘beforemaths’ of advanced military technologies

Mark Griffiths, Kali Rubaii
17 citations
Security Dialogue
Geographies of human-animal interactions
33.26
article

Late modern war and the geos : The ecological ‘beforemaths’ of advanced military technologies

Mark Griffiths, Kali Rubaii
article en
17 citations

Abstract

This article develops the idea that late modern war's relationship with the <i>geos</i> (the ground and the life it sustains) is doubly destructive. While part of this is recognized in a recent focus on slow violence and ecological aftermaths, there is little consideration of the 'beforemath', or the sites of extraction that make advanced military technologies possible. Drawing attention to mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the article connects military technologies to arms manufacturers and their use of extracted minerals (e.g. cobalt, tantalum, copper, uranium). Shared patterns of environmental and public health effects across parts of Iraq, Gaza and the DRC indicate the doubly destructive nature of late modern war's relationship with the <i>geos</i>: toxic materials threaten life <i>after</i> war as the deposits of bombardment and <i>before</i> war as mineral commodities at the beginning of arms supply chains. The article explicates how a perspective from the beforemath radically refigures the ways we think about war and spatiality, temporality, and the range of bodies affected in ways that promise a fuller understanding of the violence distributed by practices of late modern war.

Security DialogueVol. 56(1)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Newcastle University (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
33.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.