How Does Survey Timing Influence Apparent Wasting Trends? A Case Study from Senegal

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Child wasting is known to exhibit seasonal patterns but few studies have examined how the seasonality of wasting affects tracking of wasting trends over multi-year periods. <h3>Objective</h3> We explored the seasonality of wasting in Senegal relative to multi-year changes and examined implications for tracking. We tested whether month fixed-effects reduced bias in estimating longer-term wasting trends given variation in survey timing. <h3>Methods</h3> The average prevalence of child wasting (weight-for-height z-score < -2) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by month and year from the continuous Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2012-2019. Peak and low wasting season estimates were defined as the four highest and the four lowest months of average wasting prevalence. Month-adjusted annual wasting estimates were generated using month-fixed effects linear regression, and the effectiveness of this method of bias adjustment was examined in simulated datasets. <h3>Results</h3> Nationally, wasting fluctuated from 2013-2019, with the lowest annual prevalence of 6.0% (95% CI, 5.1 – 7.0%) recorded in 2014 and the highest in 2017 at 9.0% (95% CI, 8.3% - 9.8%). Pooled across years, the peak wasting season prevalence was 8.8% (95% CI, 8.3% - 9.3%), and low wasting season prevalence was 6.4% (95% CI, 5.7% - 7.1%). Month-adjusted wasting estimates did not differ notably from raw wasting prevalence estimates. Simulations demonstrated that adjusting for months reduces bias in wasting when surveys are conducted one or two months apart across waves, but fails to reliably do so when surveys are conducted in different seasons across waves. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Seasonal fluctuations in the prevalence of wasting can be large enough to bias the interpretation of multi-year trends. Efforts should be made to conduct national surveys at the same time of year. Seasonality adjustment using month fixed effects works more reliably when the differences in survey periods across waves are minimal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Developments in Nutrition
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104480
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Does Survey Timing Influence Apparent Wasting Trends? A Case Study from Senegal

Leah Bevis, Andrew Thorne‐Lyman, Rebecca Heidkamp, Karan S. Shakya
1 citations
Current Developments in Nutrition
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
0.85
article

How Does Survey Timing Influence Apparent Wasting Trends? A Case Study from Senegal

Leah Bevis, Andrew Thorne‐Lyman, Rebecca Heidkamp, Karan S. Shakya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Child wasting is known to exhibit seasonal patterns but few studies have examined how the seasonality of wasting affects tracking of wasting trends over multi-year periods. <h3>Objective</h3> We explored the seasonality of wasting in Senegal relative to multi-year changes and examined implications for tracking. We tested whether month fixed-effects reduced bias in estimating longer-term wasting trends given variation in survey timing. <h3>Methods</h3> The average prevalence of child wasting (weight-for-height z-score < -2) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by month and year from the continuous Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2012-2019. Peak and low wasting season estimates were defined as the four highest and the four lowest months of average wasting prevalence. Month-adjusted annual wasting estimates were generated using month-fixed effects linear regression, and the effectiveness of this method of bias adjustment was examined in simulated datasets. <h3>Results</h3> Nationally, wasting fluctuated from 2013-2019, with the lowest annual prevalence of 6.0% (95% CI, 5.1 – 7.0%) recorded in 2014 and the highest in 2017 at 9.0% (95% CI, 8.3% - 9.8%). Pooled across years, the peak wasting season prevalence was 8.8% (95% CI, 8.3% - 9.3%), and low wasting season prevalence was 6.4% (95% CI, 5.7% - 7.1%). Month-adjusted wasting estimates did not differ notably from raw wasting prevalence estimates. Simulations demonstrated that adjusting for months reduces bias in wasting when surveys are conducted one or two months apart across waves, but fails to reliably do so when surveys are conducted in different seasons across waves. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Seasonal fluctuations in the prevalence of wasting can be large enough to bias the interpretation of multi-year trends. Efforts should be made to conduct national surveys at the same time of year. Seasonality adjustment using month fixed effects works more reliably when the differences in survey periods across waves are minimal.

Current Developments in NutritionVol. 10(3)
Johns Hopkins University (US), The Ohio State University (US)
United States Agency for International Development, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.