Developing a Set of Standardized Core Principles and Methods Across Multiple Training and Technical Assistance Centers

Despite a growing body of research demonstrating the value of using evidence-based programs and practices (EBPPs) to address health and education issues, the gap between research evidence and practice in education and human services continues to be a vexing problem. Technical assistance (TA) is widely accepted as a key strategy to support evidence-based programs and practices (EBPP) uptake and implementation. However, little is known about how TA practices are used in TA delivery. Moreover, little attention has been paid to building the capacity of TA providers and assessing the fidelity of the implementation of TA practices. The case example presented in this article describes one organization's efforts to develop common language and definitions of TA services, core principles, and methods, and to standardize the delivery of TA by enhancing the capacity and retention of TA providers. We conclude with recommendations about how like organizations can employ similar efforts to improve the quality and consistency of TA delivery, thereby establishing a foundation for building a strong evidence base.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241291052
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a Set of Standardized Core Principles and Methods Across Multiple Training and Technical Assistance Centers

David Osher, Victoria Cirks, Lynn Holdheide, E. Chagnon
7 citations
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Health Policy Implementation Science
5.95
article

Developing a Set of Standardized Core Principles and Methods Across Multiple Training and Technical Assistance Centers

David Osher, Victoria Cirks, Lynn Holdheide, E. Chagnon
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Despite a growing body of research demonstrating the value of using evidence-based programs and practices (EBPPs) to address health and education issues, the gap between research evidence and practice in education and human services continues to be a vexing problem. Technical assistance (TA) is widely accepted as a key strategy to support evidence-based programs and practices (EBPP) uptake and implementation. However, little is known about how TA practices are used in TA delivery. Moreover, little attention has been paid to building the capacity of TA providers and assessing the fidelity of the implementation of TA practices. The case example presented in this article describes one organization's efforts to develop common language and definitions of TA services, core principles, and methods, and to standardize the delivery of TA by enhancing the capacity and retention of TA providers. We conclude with recommendations about how like organizations can employ similar efforts to improve the quality and consistency of TA delivery, thereby establishing a foundation for building a strong evidence base.

Evaluation & the Health ProfessionsVol. 47(4)
American Institutes for Research (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Policy Implementation Science
5.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.