Increased lipoprotein (a) as an additional factor in the failure to achieve target blood pressure levels and lipid spectrum optimal parameters in patients with arterial hypertension and multifocal atherosclerosis

Aim . To establish the frequency of achieving target of blood pressure (BP) levels and lipid spectrum parameters (LS) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and multifocal atherosclerotic lesion (MFAL) with normal and elevated levels of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) in real clinical practice. Material and methods . The study included 110 patients with AH and MFAL, median age was 59.0 (51.0; 64.3) years. Depending on the level of Lp(a), all patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 — 72 patients (65.5%), Lp(a) level was ≤50 mg/dl (13.2 (3.7; 21.1)), group 2 — 38 patients (34.5%) Lp(a) level was >50 mg/dl (89.5 (62.5; 110.0)). The diagnosis of MFAL included damage to two or more arterial basins according to carotid artery, abdominal aorta and lower extremities arteries duplex scan. Patients of both groups received antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antiplatelet therapy. Results . Patients in groups 1 and 2 showed similar blood pressure levels and frequency of antihypertensive therapy use. In both groups, the majority of patients were on a free combination of antihypertensive drugs, only a third of patients used a fixed combination. In most cases, patients of both groups did not reach the target blood pressure levels (63.9% — group 1, 55.3% — group 2), despite the fact that the average blood pressure figures were relatively low (132;83 mmHg in each group). Drug control was also unsatisfactory in both groups, regardless of the level of Lp(a). However, all drug indicators were significantly worse in group 2, despite comparable lipid-lowering therapy, which more often included statin monotherapy. Combination therapy with lipid-lowering drugs was used in patients of groups 1 and 2 only in 20.8% and 10.5%, respectively. Parameters of low-grade inflammation high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 did not differ between the groups and did not exceed the reference values. Conclusion . An increased level of Lp(a) may be accompanied by drug disorders and increased BP in patients with MFAL. Due to the lack of effective Lp(a) reducing therapy, the prevention of cardiovascular events in such patients should focus on BP and lipid spectrum correction. The use of fixed combinations, including antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs, can lead to improved adherence to therapy, increased BP and LS control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2024-3081
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increased lipoprotein (a) as an additional factor in the failure to achieve target blood pressure levels and lipid spectrum optimal parameters in patients with arterial hypertension and multifocal atherosclerosis

O. G. Smolenskaya, S. S. Vedenskaya
Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Increased lipoprotein (a) as an additional factor in the failure to achieve target blood pressure levels and lipid spectrum optimal parameters in patients with arterial hypertension and multifocal atherosclerosis

O. G. Smolenskaya, S. S. Vedenskaya
article en

Abstract

Aim . To establish the frequency of achieving target of blood pressure (BP) levels and lipid spectrum parameters (LS) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and multifocal atherosclerotic lesion (MFAL) with normal and elevated levels of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) in real clinical practice. Material and methods . The study included 110 patients with AH and MFAL, median age was 59.0 (51.0; 64.3) years. Depending on the level of Lp(a), all patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 — 72 patients (65.5%), Lp(a) level was ≤50 mg/dl (13.2 (3.7; 21.1)), group 2 — 38 patients (34.5%) Lp(a) level was >50 mg/dl (89.5 (62.5; 110.0)). The diagnosis of MFAL included damage to two or more arterial basins according to carotid artery, abdominal aorta and lower extremities arteries duplex scan. Patients of both groups received antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antiplatelet therapy. Results . Patients in groups 1 and 2 showed similar blood pressure levels and frequency of antihypertensive therapy use. In both groups, the majority of patients were on a free combination of antihypertensive drugs, only a third of patients used a fixed combination. In most cases, patients of both groups did not reach the target blood pressure levels (63.9% — group 1, 55.3% — group 2), despite the fact that the average blood pressure figures were relatively low (132;83 mmHg in each group). Drug control was also unsatisfactory in both groups, regardless of the level of Lp(a). However, all drug indicators were significantly worse in group 2, despite comparable lipid-lowering therapy, which more often included statin monotherapy. Combination therapy with lipid-lowering drugs was used in patients of groups 1 and 2 only in 20.8% and 10.5%, respectively. Parameters of low-grade inflammation high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 did not differ between the groups and did not exceed the reference values. Conclusion . An increased level of Lp(a) may be accompanied by drug disorders and increased BP in patients with MFAL. Due to the lack of effective Lp(a) reducing therapy, the prevention of cardiovascular events in such patients should focus on BP and lipid spectrum correction. The use of fixed combinations, including antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs, can lead to improved adherence to therapy, increased BP and LS control.

Rational Pharmacotherapy in CardiologyVol. 20(4)
Ural State Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.