Circumstantial factors and local collaboration determine farmers' perceptions and practices on circular bioeconomy – examples from Southern Sweden

• Pea producing farmers’ perception of circular bioeconomy was investigated. • Farmers are closing, slowing and narrowing biological flows in their practices. • Inflation, market demands, and regulations are strong influential factors. • Local networks and collaborations support enhancements of waste and by-products. • The former two can aid farmers to act on the policy-driven circular bioeconomy. Economic systems that rely on linear growth and non-renewable resources have enhanced environmental impact of agricultural practices at a global scale. The literature portrays an urgent need to align agricultural practices with economic pathways that utilize and regenerate biological resources more. Circular bioeconomy promotes means for the agri-food sector to close, narrow, and slow biological resource flows. As farmers have a pivotal role in facilitating a transition to circular bioeconomy, this study analyzes farmers' perceptions and practices related to circular bioeconomy. Based on 11 semi-structured interviews with Swedish farmers the study highlights the role of pea cultivation as a tangible means to facilitate circular bioeconomy within the agri-food sector. The empirical findings of the study depict how farmers facilitate circular bioeconomy by closing, slowing and narrowing biological flows through waste management practices, technological means, and regenerative practices. The overarching results show how circumstantial factors such as inflation, market demand and regulations influence farmers perceptions and practices on circular bioeconomy, and how local networks and collaboration can facilitate cascading use and valorization of waste and by-products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100114
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circumstantial factors and local collaboration determine farmers' perceptions and practices on circular bioeconomy – examples from Southern Sweden

Madelene Ostwald, Sara Pettersson, Therese Asplund
3 citations
Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
4.03
article

Circumstantial factors and local collaboration determine farmers' perceptions and practices on circular bioeconomy – examples from Southern Sweden

Madelene Ostwald, Sara Pettersson, Therese Asplund
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Pea producing farmers’ perception of circular bioeconomy was investigated. • Farmers are closing, slowing and narrowing biological flows in their practices. • Inflation, market demands, and regulations are strong influential factors. • Local networks and collaborations support enhancements of waste and by-products. • The former two can aid farmers to act on the policy-driven circular bioeconomy. Economic systems that rely on linear growth and non-renewable resources have enhanced environmental impact of agricultural practices at a global scale. The literature portrays an urgent need to align agricultural practices with economic pathways that utilize and regenerate biological resources more. Circular bioeconomy promotes means for the agri-food sector to close, narrow, and slow biological resource flows. As farmers have a pivotal role in facilitating a transition to circular bioeconomy, this study analyzes farmers' perceptions and practices related to circular bioeconomy. Based on 11 semi-structured interviews with Swedish farmers the study highlights the role of pea cultivation as a tangible means to facilitate circular bioeconomy within the agri-food sector. The empirical findings of the study depict how farmers facilitate circular bioeconomy by closing, slowing and narrowing biological flows through waste management practices, technological means, and regenerative practices. The overarching results show how circumstantial factors such as inflation, market demand and regulations influence farmers perceptions and practices on circular bioeconomy, and how local networks and collaboration can facilitate cascading use and valorization of waste and by-products.

Cleaner and Circular BioeconomyVol. 9
Linköping University (SE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
4.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Circumstantial factors and local collaboration determine farmers' perceptions and practices on circular bioeconomy – examples from Southern Sweden — Madelene Ostwald, Sara Pettersson, et al. · Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS