Mathematical model of the Alzheimer’s disease biomarker cascade demonstrates statistical pitfall in identifying surrogates of cognitive reserve

Statistical interaction analyses with biomarkers of pathology on cognitive outcome have been put forward to investigate neurobiological surrogates of cognitive reserve in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, as these potential surrogates are likely affected by neurodegeneration during the course of AD, their joint alteration with biomarkers of pathology and cognitive outcome during disease progression may introduce misinterpretable interaction effects in cross-sectional studies. To demonstrate this, we conducted interaction analyses on synthetic data from a mathematical model of the AD biomarker cascade. When randomly sampling cross-sectionally, these gave interaction effects, which greatly reduced when controlling for the corresponding time point of each sampled data point. Cross-sectional studies investigating cognitive reserve using interaction analyses are advised to take into account the different time stages of the disease that individual data points represent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111188
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematical model of the Alzheimer’s disease biomarker cascade demonstrates statistical pitfall in identifying surrogates of cognitive reserve

Susanne Gerber, Florian U. Fischer, Oliver Tüscher
iScience
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Mathematical model of the Alzheimer’s disease biomarker cascade demonstrates statistical pitfall in identifying surrogates of cognitive reserve

Susanne Gerber, Florian U. Fischer, Oliver Tüscher
article en

Abstract

Statistical interaction analyses with biomarkers of pathology on cognitive outcome have been put forward to investigate neurobiological surrogates of cognitive reserve in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, as these potential surrogates are likely affected by neurodegeneration during the course of AD, their joint alteration with biomarkers of pathology and cognitive outcome during disease progression may introduce misinterpretable interaction effects in cross-sectional studies. To demonstrate this, we conducted interaction analyses on synthetic data from a mathematical model of the AD biomarker cascade. When randomly sampling cross-sectionally, these gave interaction effects, which greatly reduced when controlling for the corresponding time point of each sampled data point. Cross-sectional studies investigating cognitive reserve using interaction analyses are advised to take into account the different time stages of the disease that individual data points represent.

iScienceVol. 27(11)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
U.S. Department of Defense, Alzheimer's Association, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Biogen, Meso Scale Diagnostics, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, BioClinica, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Northern California Institute for Research and Education, Eisai, Servier, H. Lundbeck A/S, IXICO, National Institutes of Health, Genentech, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.