A macroecological analysis of ecological uniqueness of freshwater macrophyte assemblages across Europe and North America

Abstract Understanding spatial variation of species composition at different scales is essential for efficient conservation planning. Here, we investigate ecological uniqueness patterns of freshwater macrophyte assemblages at continental extents. We explored the similarities and differences in the patterns of ecological uniqueness between Europe and North America in relation to species richness and environmental variables using macrophyte presence–absence data in 50 × 50 km grid cells. To describe the ecological uniqueness of macrophyte assemblages, we used an index called ‘local contribution to beta diversity’ (LCBD). First, we used linear regression to evaluate the relationship between ecological uniqueness and species richness. Second, the variation of ecological uniqueness was modelled using environmental variables in generalized additive modelling (GAM). Third, boosted regression tree (BRT) analysis was performed with the same environmental variables to compare BRT results with the results from GAM. The results revealed relatively similar patterns of ecological uniqueness in both continents. The relationship between species richness and ecological uniqueness was overall negative but showed differences in the form and degree of the relationship between Europe and North America. The main driver of ecological uniqueness in both continents was mean annual temperature, with further effects associated with annual precipitation, elevation range, alkalinity and the proportion of freshwaters in a grid cell. Synthesis . Our results showed that species richness and ecological uniqueness may be negatively correlated at large spatial extents, and that the form of the relationship is likely to depend on the species richness profile of the area. The significant influence of climate on the ecological uniqueness of macrophyte assemblages suggests that changes in climate and land use may shape unique macrophyte assemblages. Thus, conservation strategies should consider protection measures, especially in the northern areas with unique macrophyte species assemblages, as they are expected to face many changes in the future. Identifying areas with high ecological uniqueness at different scales is important for efficient implementation of biodiversity conservation practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecology
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14434
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A macroecological analysis of ecological uniqueness of freshwater macrophyte assemblages across Europe and North America

Aveliina Helm, Jan Hjort, Jani Heino, Janne Alahuhta et al.
6 citations
Journal of Ecology
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
1.50
article

A macroecological analysis of ecological uniqueness of freshwater macrophyte assemblages across Europe and North America

Aveliina Helm, Jan Hjort, Jani Heino, Janne Alahuhta, Saara Luukkonen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Understanding spatial variation of species composition at different scales is essential for efficient conservation planning. Here, we investigate ecological uniqueness patterns of freshwater macrophyte assemblages at continental extents. We explored the similarities and differences in the patterns of ecological uniqueness between Europe and North America in relation to species richness and environmental variables using macrophyte presence–absence data in 50 × 50 km grid cells. To describe the ecological uniqueness of macrophyte assemblages, we used an index called ‘local contribution to beta diversity’ (LCBD). First, we used linear regression to evaluate the relationship between ecological uniqueness and species richness. Second, the variation of ecological uniqueness was modelled using environmental variables in generalized additive modelling (GAM). Third, boosted regression tree (BRT) analysis was performed with the same environmental variables to compare BRT results with the results from GAM. The results revealed relatively similar patterns of ecological uniqueness in both continents. The relationship between species richness and ecological uniqueness was overall negative but showed differences in the form and degree of the relationship between Europe and North America. The main driver of ecological uniqueness in both continents was mean annual temperature, with further effects associated with annual precipitation, elevation range, alkalinity and the proportion of freshwaters in a grid cell. Synthesis . Our results showed that species richness and ecological uniqueness may be negatively correlated at large spatial extents, and that the form of the relationship is likely to depend on the species richness profile of the area. The significant influence of climate on the ecological uniqueness of macrophyte assemblages suggests that changes in climate and land use may shape unique macrophyte assemblages. Thus, conservation strategies should consider protection measures, especially in the northern areas with unique macrophyte species assemblages, as they are expected to face many changes in the future. Identifying areas with high ecological uniqueness at different scales is important for efficient implementation of biodiversity conservation practices.

Journal of EcologyVol. 112(12)
University of Tartu (EE), University of Oulu (FI)
Eesti Teadusagentuur, Biotieteiden ja Ympäristön Tutkimuksen Toimikunta
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.