Sumoylation of thymine DNA glycosylase impairs productive binding to substrate sites in DNA

The base excision repair enzyme thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) protects against mutations by removing thymine or uracil from guanine mispairs and functions in active DNA demethylation by excising 5-formylcytosine (fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (caC). Post-translational modification of TDG by SUMO (small ubiquitin-like modifier) reduces its glycosylase activity but the mechanism remains unclear. We investigated this problem using biochemical and biophysical approaches and a TDG construct comprising residues 82 to 340 (of 410) that includes the SUMOylation site and the motif for non-covalent SUMO binding. Single turnover kinetics experiments were collected at multiple enzyme concentrations ([E]) and the hyperbolic dependence of activity (k<sub>obs</sub>) on [E] yielded the maximal glycosylase activity (k<sub>max</sub>), the enzyme concentration giving half-maximal activity (K<sub>0.5</sub>), and the catalytic efficiency (k<sub>max</sub>/K<sub>0.5</sub>). Sumoylation of TDG (or TDG<sup>82-340</sup>) causes large reductions in catalytic efficiency for G·T, G·U, G·fC, and G·caC DNA substrates, due largely to weakened substrate affinity (increased K<sub>0.5</sub>). <sup>19</sup>F NMR experiments show that sumoylation of TDG<sup>82-340</sup> reduces productive binding to G·U mispairs and dramatically impairs binding to G·T mispairs. A mutation in the TDG SUMO-interacting motif (SIM), E310Q, shown previously to perturb the noncovalent binding of SUMO to unmodified TDG, rescues the glycosylase activity of sumoylated TDG<sup>82-340</sup>. Similarly, NMR studies show the mutation restores the productive binding of sumoylated TDG<sup>82-340</sup> to G·U and G·T pairs. Together, the results indicate that intramolecular SUMO-SIM interactions mediate the adverse effect of sumoylation on TDG activity and suggest a model whereby the disruption of SUMO-SIM interactions enables productive binding of sumoylated TDG to substrate sites in DNA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107902
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sumoylation of thymine DNA glycosylase impairs productive binding to substrate sites in DNA

Kristen M. Varney, L.S. Pidugu, Hardler W. Servius, Mary E. Cook et al.
8 citations
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
1.87
article

Sumoylation of thymine DNA glycosylase impairs productive binding to substrate sites in DNA

Kristen M. Varney, L.S. Pidugu, Hardler W. Servius, Mary E. Cook, Alexander C. Drohat, Kenneth Andrei Espinosa
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The base excision repair enzyme thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) protects against mutations by removing thymine or uracil from guanine mispairs and functions in active DNA demethylation by excising 5-formylcytosine (fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (caC). Post-translational modification of TDG by SUMO (small ubiquitin-like modifier) reduces its glycosylase activity but the mechanism remains unclear. We investigated this problem using biochemical and biophysical approaches and a TDG construct comprising residues 82 to 340 (of 410) that includes the SUMOylation site and the motif for non-covalent SUMO binding. Single turnover kinetics experiments were collected at multiple enzyme concentrations ([E]) and the hyperbolic dependence of activity (k<sub>obs</sub>) on [E] yielded the maximal glycosylase activity (k<sub>max</sub>), the enzyme concentration giving half-maximal activity (K<sub>0.5</sub>), and the catalytic efficiency (k<sub>max</sub>/K<sub>0.5</sub>). Sumoylation of TDG (or TDG<sup>82-340</sup>) causes large reductions in catalytic efficiency for G·T, G·U, G·fC, and G·caC DNA substrates, due largely to weakened substrate affinity (increased K<sub>0.5</sub>). <sup>19</sup>F NMR experiments show that sumoylation of TDG<sup>82-340</sup> reduces productive binding to G·U mispairs and dramatically impairs binding to G·T mispairs. A mutation in the TDG SUMO-interacting motif (SIM), E310Q, shown previously to perturb the noncovalent binding of SUMO to unmodified TDG, rescues the glycosylase activity of sumoylated TDG<sup>82-340</sup>. Similarly, NMR studies show the mutation restores the productive binding of sumoylated TDG<sup>82-340</sup> to G·U and G·T pairs. Together, the results indicate that intramolecular SUMO-SIM interactions mediate the adverse effect of sumoylation on TDG activity and suggest a model whereby the disruption of SUMO-SIM interactions enables productive binding of sumoylated TDG to substrate sites in DNA.

Journal of Biological ChemistryVol. 300(11)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.