Crafting Digital Experiences: Embedding Human-Centred and Participatory Design into Archaeological Practice

As digital archaeology has grown as a field of practice, so has the number of digital resources developed for specialists and nonspecialists alike. However, the creation of such outputs has not always been accompanied and informed by design theory and practices. Design—used in its broadest definition as a process of conceptual making—is an integral, if often implicit, part of archaeological practices and it is through design that we develop and share our work—from data collection and analysis to interpretation and dissemination—and engage with our stakeholders. Engaging with core design practices offers meaningful opportunities for generating new forms of archaeological knowledge production and sharing, as well as creating digitally mediated experiences that are not guided by our own assumptions about our stakeholders’ needs and can really affect people’s engagement with the past. In this article, I investigate the benefits of embedding Human-Centred and Participatory Design into the archaeology and heritage sectors to create more critically engaged digital encounters with the past.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3700880
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crafting Digital Experiences: Embedding Human-Centred and Participatory Design into Archaeological Practice

Francesca Dolcetti
3 citations
Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.12
article

Crafting Digital Experiences: Embedding Human-Centred and Participatory Design into Archaeological Practice

Francesca Dolcetti
article en
3 citations

Abstract

As digital archaeology has grown as a field of practice, so has the number of digital resources developed for specialists and nonspecialists alike. However, the creation of such outputs has not always been accompanied and informed by design theory and practices. Design—used in its broadest definition as a process of conceptual making—is an integral, if often implicit, part of archaeological practices and it is through design that we develop and share our work—from data collection and analysis to interpretation and dissemination—and engage with our stakeholders. Engaging with core design practices offers meaningful opportunities for generating new forms of archaeological knowledge production and sharing, as well as creating digitally mediated experiences that are not guided by our own assumptions about our stakeholders’ needs and can really affect people’s engagement with the past. In this article, I investigate the benefits of embedding Human-Centred and Participatory Design into the archaeology and heritage sectors to create more critically engaged digital encounters with the past.

Journal on Computing and Cultural HeritageVol. 18(1)
University of Essex (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.