Coding-PTMs: How to Find Optimal Code Pre-trained Models for Code Embedding in Vulnerability Detection?

Vulnerability detection is garnering increasing attention in software engineering, since code vulnerabilities possibly pose significant security. Recently, reusing various code pre-trained models (e.g., CodeBERT, CodeT5, and CodeGen) has become common for code embedding without providing reasonable justifications in vulnerability detection. The premise for casually utilizing pre-trained models (PTMs) is that the code embeddings generated by different PTMs would generate a similar impact on the performance. Is that TRUE? To answer this important question, we systematically investigate the effects of code embedding generated by ten different code PTMs on the performance of vulnerability detection, and get the answer, i.e., that is NOT true. We observe that code embedding generated by various code PTMs can indeed influence the performance and selecting an embedding technique based on parameter scales and embedding dimension is not reliable. Our findings highlight the necessity of quantifying and evaluating the characteristics of code embedding generated by various code PTMs to understand the effects. To achieve this goal, we analyze the numerical representation and data distribution of code embedding generated by different PTMs to evaluate differences and characteristics. Based on these insights, we propose Coding-PTMs, a recommendation framework to assist engineers in selecting optimal code PTMs for their specific vulnerability detection tasks. Specifically, we define thirteen code embedding metrics across three dimensions (i.e., statistics, norm, and distribution) for constructing a specialized code PTM recommendation dataset. We then employ a Random Forest classifier to train a recommendation model and identify the optimal code PTMs from the candidate model zoo. We encourage engineers to use our Coding-PTMs to evaluate the characteristics of code embeddings generated by candidate code PTMs on the performance and recommend optimal code PTMs for code embedding in their vulnerability detection tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3691620.3695539
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coding-PTMs: How to Find Optimal Code Pre-trained Models for Code Embedding in Vulnerability Detection?

Fei Wu, Zhiqiu Huang, Lina Gong, Mingqiang Wei et al.
8 citations
Software Engineering Research
6.23
article

Coding-PTMs: How to Find Optimal Code Pre-trained Models for Code Embedding in Vulnerability Detection?

Fei Wu, Zhiqiu Huang, Lina Gong, Mingqiang Wei, Yu Zhao, Yongwei Wang
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Vulnerability detection is garnering increasing attention in software engineering, since code vulnerabilities possibly pose significant security. Recently, reusing various code pre-trained models (e.g., CodeBERT, CodeT5, and CodeGen) has become common for code embedding without providing reasonable justifications in vulnerability detection. The premise for casually utilizing pre-trained models (PTMs) is that the code embeddings generated by different PTMs would generate a similar impact on the performance. Is that TRUE? To answer this important question, we systematically investigate the effects of code embedding generated by ten different code PTMs on the performance of vulnerability detection, and get the answer, i.e., that is NOT true. We observe that code embedding generated by various code PTMs can indeed influence the performance and selecting an embedding technique based on parameter scales and embedding dimension is not reliable. Our findings highlight the necessity of quantifying and evaluating the characteristics of code embedding generated by various code PTMs to understand the effects. To achieve this goal, we analyze the numerical representation and data distribution of code embedding generated by different PTMs to evaluate differences and characteristics. Based on these insights, we propose Coding-PTMs, a recommendation framework to assist engineers in selecting optimal code PTMs for their specific vulnerability detection tasks. Specifically, we define thirteen code embedding metrics across three dimensions (i.e., statistics, norm, and distribution) for constructing a specialized code PTM recommendation dataset. We then employ a Random Forest classifier to train a recommendation model and identify the optimal code PTMs from the candidate model zoo. We encourage engineers to use our Coding-PTMs to evaluate the characteristics of code embeddings generated by candidate code PTMs on the performance and recommend optimal code PTMs for code embedding in their vulnerability detection tasks.

Zhejiang University of Science and Technology (CN), Zhejiang University (CN), Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Software Engineering Research
6.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.