A Conceptual Framework for Quality Assurance of LLM-based Socio-critical Systems

Recent breakthroughs in Artificial Intelligence (AI) obfuscate the boundaries between digital, physical, and social spaces, a trend expected to continue in the foreseeable future. Traditionally, software engineering has prioritized technical aspects, focusing on functional correctness and reliability while often neglecting broader societal implications. With the rise of software agents enabled by Large Language Models (LLMs) and capable of emulating human intelligence and perception, there is a growing recognition of the need for addressing socio-critical issues. Unlike technical challenges, these issues cannot be resolved through traditional, deterministic approaches due to their subjective nature and dependence on evolving factors such as culture and demographics. This paper dives into this problem and advocates the need for revising existing engineering principles and methodologies. We propose a conceptual framework for quality assurance where AI is not only the driver of socio-critical systems but also a fundamental tool in their engineering process. Such framework encapsulates pre-production and runtime workflows where LLM-based agents, so-called artificial doppelgängers, continuously assess and refine socio-critical systems ensuring their alignment with established societal standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3691620.3695306
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Conceptual Framework for Quality Assurance of LLM-based Socio-critical Systems

Tommaso Dolci, Giovanni Quattrocchi, Luciano Baresi, Matteo Camilli
4 citations
Software Engineering Research
3.12
article

A Conceptual Framework for Quality Assurance of LLM-based Socio-critical Systems

Tommaso Dolci, Giovanni Quattrocchi, Luciano Baresi, Matteo Camilli
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Recent breakthroughs in Artificial Intelligence (AI) obfuscate the boundaries between digital, physical, and social spaces, a trend expected to continue in the foreseeable future. Traditionally, software engineering has prioritized technical aspects, focusing on functional correctness and reliability while often neglecting broader societal implications. With the rise of software agents enabled by Large Language Models (LLMs) and capable of emulating human intelligence and perception, there is a growing recognition of the need for addressing socio-critical issues. Unlike technical challenges, these issues cannot be resolved through traditional, deterministic approaches due to their subjective nature and dependence on evolving factors such as culture and demographics. This paper dives into this problem and advocates the need for revising existing engineering principles and methodologies. We propose a conceptual framework for quality assurance where AI is not only the driver of socio-critical systems but also a fundamental tool in their engineering process. Such framework encapsulates pre-production and runtime workflows where LLM-based agents, so-called artificial doppelgängers, continuously assess and refine socio-critical systems ensuring their alignment with established societal standards.

Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Software Engineering Research
3.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Conceptual Framework for Quality Assurance of LLM-based Socio-critical Systems — Tommaso Dolci, Giovanni Quattrocchi, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS