Efficient Incremental Code Coverage Analysis for Regression Test Suites

Code coverage analysis has been widely adopted in the continuous integration of open-source and industry software repositories to monitor the adequacy of regression test suites. However, computing code coverage can be costly, introducing significant overhead during test execution. Plus, re-collecting code coverage for the entire test suite is usually unnecessary when only a part of the coverage data is affected by code changes. While regression test selection (RTS) techniques exist to select a subset of tests whose behaviors may be affected by code changes, they are not compatible with code coverage analysis techniques---that is, simply executing RTS-selected tests leads to incorrect code coverage results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3691620.3695551
Primary Topic
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficient Incremental Code Coverage Analysis for Regression Test Suites

Pengyu Nie, Jiale Wang, Kaiyuan Wang
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
article

Efficient Incremental Code Coverage Analysis for Regression Test Suites

Pengyu Nie, Jiale Wang, Kaiyuan Wang
article en

Abstract

Code coverage analysis has been widely adopted in the continuous integration of open-source and industry software repositories to monitor the adequacy of regression test suites. However, computing code coverage can be costly, introducing significant overhead during test execution. Plus, re-collecting code coverage for the entire test suite is usually unnecessary when only a part of the coverage data is affected by code changes. While regression test selection (RTS) techniques exist to select a subset of tests whose behaviors may be affected by code changes, they are not compatible with code coverage analysis techniques---that is, simply executing RTS-selected tests leads to incorrect code coverage results.

Google (United States) (US), University of Waterloo (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.