Backtest overfitting in the machine learning era: A comparison of out-of-sample testing methods in a synthetic controlled environment

We present a comprehensive framework to assess these methods, considering the unique characteristics of financial data like non-stationarity, autocorrelation , and regime shifts. Through our analysis, we unveil the marked superiority of the Combinatorial Purged (CPCV) method in mitigating overfitting risks, outperforming traditional methods as evidenced by its lower Probability of Backtest Overfitting (PBO) and superior Deflated Sharpe Ratio (DSR) test statistic. Walk-Forward, by contrast, exhibits notable shortcomings in false discovery prevention, characterized by increased temporal variability and weaker stationarity . This contrasts with CPCV’s demonstrable stability and efficiency. We introduce novel variants of CPCV , including Bagged CPCV and Adaptive CPCV, which enhance robustness through ensemble approaches and dynamic adjustments based on market conditions. Our empirical validation using historical SP 500 data confirms these advanced cross-validation methods’ practical applicability and resilience. The analysis also suggests that choosing between Purged K-Fold and K-Fold necessitates caution due to their comparable performance and potential impact on the robustness of training data in out-of-sample testing. Our investigation utilizes a Synthetic Controlled Environment incorporating advanced models like the Heston Stochastic Volatility, Merton Jump Diffusion, and Drift-Burst Hypothesis alongside regime-switching models. This approach provides a nuanced simulation of market conditions, offering new insights into evaluating cross-validation techniques. We also address the computational aspects of these methods, demonstrating that parallelization significantly improves efficiency, making them feasible for large-scale financial datasets. Our study underscores the necessity of specialized validation methods in financial modeling , especially in the face of growing regulatory demands and complex market dynamics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge-Based Systems
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112477
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Backtest overfitting in the machine learning era: A comparison of out-of-sample testing methods in a synthetic controlled environment

Luís Gonçalves‐Seco, Hamid R. Arian, Daniel Norouzi Mobarekeh
8 citations
Knowledge-Based Systems
Statistical Methods and Inference
5.67
article

Backtest overfitting in the machine learning era: A comparison of out-of-sample testing methods in a synthetic controlled environment

Luís Gonçalves‐Seco, Hamid R. Arian, Daniel Norouzi Mobarekeh
article en
8 citations

Abstract

We present a comprehensive framework to assess these methods, considering the unique characteristics of financial data like non-stationarity, autocorrelation , and regime shifts. Through our analysis, we unveil the marked superiority of the Combinatorial Purged (CPCV) method in mitigating overfitting risks, outperforming traditional methods as evidenced by its lower Probability of Backtest Overfitting (PBO) and superior Deflated Sharpe Ratio (DSR) test statistic. Walk-Forward, by contrast, exhibits notable shortcomings in false discovery prevention, characterized by increased temporal variability and weaker stationarity . This contrasts with CPCV’s demonstrable stability and efficiency. We introduce novel variants of CPCV , including Bagged CPCV and Adaptive CPCV, which enhance robustness through ensemble approaches and dynamic adjustments based on market conditions. Our empirical validation using historical SP 500 data confirms these advanced cross-validation methods’ practical applicability and resilience. The analysis also suggests that choosing between Purged K-Fold and K-Fold necessitates caution due to their comparable performance and potential impact on the robustness of training data in out-of-sample testing. Our investigation utilizes a Synthetic Controlled Environment incorporating advanced models like the Heston Stochastic Volatility, Merton Jump Diffusion, and Drift-Burst Hypothesis alongside regime-switching models. This approach provides a nuanced simulation of market conditions, offering new insights into evaluating cross-validation techniques. We also address the computational aspects of these methods, demonstrating that parallelization significantly improves efficiency, making them feasible for large-scale financial datasets. Our study underscores the necessity of specialized validation methods in financial modeling , especially in the face of growing regulatory demands and complex market dynamics.

Knowledge-Based SystemsVol. 305
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Statistical Methods and Inference
5.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.