“How-to”: scoping review?
Scoping reviews are a popular form of evidence synthesis, and further research is needed to provide clarity of current methodological challenges.
Authors
- Dawid Pieper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0715-5182)
- Micah D.J. Peters (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1108-3783)
- Catrin Evans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5338-2191)
- Érica Brandão de Moraes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-158X)
- Danielle Pollock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6604-0609)
- Christina Godfrey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-3237)
- Andrea C. Tricco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-8971)
- Romy Menghao Jia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7558-8708)
- Ashrita Saran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3261-6654)
- Lyndsay Alexander (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2437-9150)
- Hanan Khali
Institutions
- Global Development Network (IN)
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Queen's University (CA)
- Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE)
- Robert Gordon University (GB)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Newcastle University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Published
- 2024-10-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111572
- Citations
- 71
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 32.75
Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council