Questions, justification requests, inference, and definition

Abstract In this paper, I examine connections between the speech acts of assertion, denial, polar questions and justification requests, and the common ground. When we pay attention to the structure of norms governing polar questions, we can clarify the distinction between strong and weak denial, together with the parallel distinction between strong and weak assertion, and the distinct way that these speech acts interact with the common ground. In addition, once we pay attention to the distinct norms concerning justification requests, we can give a distinctive answer to Carroll’s puzzle concerning the force of the logical must and the sense in which certain rules for logical concepts can indeed count as definitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04752-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Questions, justification requests, inference, and definition

Greg Restall
2 citations
Synthese
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
8.43
article

Questions, justification requests, inference, and definition

Greg Restall
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I examine connections between the speech acts of assertion, denial, polar questions and justification requests, and the common ground. When we pay attention to the structure of norms governing polar questions, we can clarify the distinction between strong and weak denial, together with the parallel distinction between strong and weak assertion, and the distinct way that these speech acts interact with the common ground. In addition, once we pay attention to the distinct norms concerning justification requests, we can give a distinctive answer to Carroll’s puzzle concerning the force of the logical must and the sense in which certain rules for logical concepts can indeed count as definitions.

SyntheseVol. 204(5)
University of St Andrews (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
8.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.