Identifying septic shock subgroups to tailor fluid strategies through multi-omics integration

Fluid management remains a critical challenge in the treatment of septic shock, with individualized approaches lacking. This study aims to develop a statistical model based on transcriptomics to identify subgroups of septic shock patients with varied responses to fluid strategy. The study encompasses 494 septic shock patients. A benefit score is derived from the transcriptome space, with higher values indicating greater benefits from restrictive fluid strategy. Adherence to the recommended strategy is associated with a hazard ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.92). When applied to the baseline hospital mortality rate of 16%, adherence to the recommended fluid strategy could potentially lower this rate to 13%. A proteomic signature comprising six proteins is developed to predict the benefit score, yielding an area under the curve of 0.802 (95% confidence interval: 0.752-0.846) in classifying patients who may benefit from a restrictive strategy. In this work, we develop a proteomic signature with potential utility in guiding fluid strategy for septic shock patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53239-9
Citations
29
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying septic shock subgroups to tailor fluid strategies through multi-omics integration

Xuandong Jiang, Zhanwei Ruan, Wei-Min Zhang, Shaojiang Zheng et al.
29 citations
Nature Communications
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
7.01
article

Identifying septic shock subgroups to tailor fluid strategies through multi-omics integration

Xuandong Jiang, Zhanwei Ruan, Wei-Min Zhang, Shaojiang Zheng, Bingshu Wang, Zhitao Zhong, Zhongheng Zhang, Lin Chen, Lingxia Cheng, Bin Sun, Pan Pan, Jie Yang, Ping Xu, Lina Xian, Hongying Ni, Yucai Hong, Shaowen Cheng, Haifeng Zhang
article en
29 citations

Abstract

Fluid management remains a critical challenge in the treatment of septic shock, with individualized approaches lacking. This study aims to develop a statistical model based on transcriptomics to identify subgroups of septic shock patients with varied responses to fluid strategy. The study encompasses 494 septic shock patients. A benefit score is derived from the transcriptome space, with higher values indicating greater benefits from restrictive fluid strategy. Adherence to the recommended strategy is associated with a hazard ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.92). When applied to the baseline hospital mortality rate of 16%, adherence to the recommended fluid strategy could potentially lower this rate to 13%. A proteomic signature comprising six proteins is developed to predict the benefit score, yielding an area under the curve of 0.802 (95% confidence interval: 0.752-0.846) in classifying patients who may benefit from a restrictive strategy. In this work, we develop a proteomic signature with potential utility in guiding fluid strategy for septic shock patients.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 15(1)
Binzhou Medical University (CN), Shandong University of Aeronautics (CN), Shaoxing University (CN), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN), Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN), Zigong First People's Hospital (CN), Dongyang People's Hospital (CN), Jinhua Central Hospital (CN), Zhejiang University (CN), Hainan Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration, Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
7.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.