Potential impact of introducing a neutral positive countercyclical capital buffer in EU countries

The aim of this study is to assess the potential to introduce a positive neutral rate for the countercyclical capital buffer (nCCyB) at 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% and 2% in 20 EU countries over the period 2014Q4 up to 2023Q3. Prudential data at country-level was used to estimate the level of banks' voluntary management buffers, which were found to be significant overall (although gradually decreasing) and enough to accommodate the introduction of the nCCyB. According to estimations, introduction of the nCCyB at those rates would have reduced banks’ management buffers on average by 6.5–26.0%. However, there is visible heterogeneity among EU countries. The resulting lowest decrease in capital headroom following the potential introduction of the nCCyB was recorded, among others, in Sweden, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Malta, Ireland, with the highest in Spain, Croatia, Greece, and Austria. However, the adoption of the nCCyB in recent years faces several hurdles, which constitute challenges for banks and policymakers alike.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Central Bank Review
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2024.100180
Primary Topic
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential impact of introducing a neutral positive countercyclical capital buffer in EU countries

Paweł Smaga
Central Bank Review
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
article

Potential impact of introducing a neutral positive countercyclical capital buffer in EU countries

Paweł Smaga
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the potential to introduce a positive neutral rate for the countercyclical capital buffer (nCCyB) at 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% and 2% in 20 EU countries over the period 2014Q4 up to 2023Q3. Prudential data at country-level was used to estimate the level of banks' voluntary management buffers, which were found to be significant overall (although gradually decreasing) and enough to accommodate the introduction of the nCCyB. According to estimations, introduction of the nCCyB at those rates would have reduced banks’ management buffers on average by 6.5–26.0%. However, there is visible heterogeneity among EU countries. The resulting lowest decrease in capital headroom following the potential introduction of the nCCyB was recorded, among others, in Sweden, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Malta, Ireland, with the highest in Spain, Croatia, Greece, and Austria. However, the adoption of the nCCyB in recent years faces several hurdles, which constitute challenges for banks and policymakers alike.

Central Bank ReviewVol. 24(4)
SGH Warsaw School of Economics (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Potential impact of introducing a neutral positive countercyclical capital buffer in EU countries — Paweł Smaga · Central Bank Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS