Social order or social justice? The relationship of political ideology with consumer preferences for Corporate Social Responsibility

Despite the recognized importance of political ideology in shaping consumer behavior across various contexts, it remains unclear whether conservatives and liberals exhibit different preferences when it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Using survey data from 598 respondents in the United States, our findings indicate a positive correlation between conservatism and consumer preference for customer, supplier, and shareholder CSR domains. Conversely, conservatism correlates negatively with consumer preference for environmental and societal CSR domains. These relationships are mediated by social order and social justice. Conservatism also has a negative indirect relationship with consumer preference for employee's CSR domain through social order. Overall, our study contributes to the marketing literature by demonstrating that political ideology is related to divergent preferences for CSR, with group-related moral motives serving as mediators in these relationships. • We study political ideology and consumer preferences for CSR domains. • Conservatism is positively related to customer, supplier, and shareholder domains. • Conservatism is negatively related to environmental and societal domains. • Moral motives -social order and social justice-have a mediating role. • Consumers' political ideology is crucial for effectively targeting CSR initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104128
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social order or social justice? The relationship of political ideology with consumer preferences for Corporate Social Responsibility

Athanasios Krystallis, Polymeros Chrysochou, Panagiotis Mitkidis, Antonios Tiganis
6 citations
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
3.33
article

Social order or social justice? The relationship of political ideology with consumer preferences for Corporate Social Responsibility

Athanasios Krystallis, Polymeros Chrysochou, Panagiotis Mitkidis, Antonios Tiganis
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Despite the recognized importance of political ideology in shaping consumer behavior across various contexts, it remains unclear whether conservatives and liberals exhibit different preferences when it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Using survey data from 598 respondents in the United States, our findings indicate a positive correlation between conservatism and consumer preference for customer, supplier, and shareholder CSR domains. Conversely, conservatism correlates negatively with consumer preference for environmental and societal CSR domains. These relationships are mediated by social order and social justice. Conservatism also has a negative indirect relationship with consumer preference for employee's CSR domain through social order. Overall, our study contributes to the marketing literature by demonstrating that political ideology is related to divergent preferences for CSR, with group-related moral motives serving as mediators in these relationships. • We study political ideology and consumer preferences for CSR domains. • Conservatism is positively related to customer, supplier, and shareholder domains. • Conservatism is negatively related to environmental and societal domains. • Moral motives -social order and social justice-have a mediating role. • Consumers' political ideology is crucial for effectively targeting CSR initiatives.

Journal of Retailing and Consumer ServicesVol. 82
Social Science Research Council (US), Duke University (US), Aarhus University (DK), The American College of Greece (GR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
3.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.