User characteristics and preferences for micromobility use in first- and last-mile journeys in Dublin, Ireland

• A stated preference experiment was conducted with a focus on first- and last-miles of public transport journeys. • A mixed logit model was estimated to identify user characteristics and preferences. • Young (<35 years old) male respondents with experience of e-scooters were interested in private and shared e-scooters. • Respondents with a strong walking preference were less likely to be interested in private micromobility and sharing services. • Private bicycles are the preferred mode after walking, while shared modes were less likely to be chosen over walking. Micromobility and public transport integration is an area of urban mobility that has been increasingly gaining attention and importance. The necessity to provide improvements to public transport services and their spatial reach in order to reduce the number and volume of car trips in cities is irrefutable. The integration of micromobility and public transport is often presented as a valuable strategy to improve door-to-door connectivity and coverage of existing public transport services, via provision of key first- and last-mile or access-egress connections. The aim of this study was to understand and model the propensity of commuters in County Dublin to use micromobility (private and shared) in the first- and last-miles of their public transport journeys. A stated preference experiment was conducted with a focus on these specific segments of the journey and a mixed logit model was estimated to identify user characteristics and preferences based on socio-economic factors, mobility patterns and attitudes towards and previous experience of shared mobility. The results show that, in this particular case study, respondents with a strong walking preference were less likely to be interested in private micromobility and sharing services for the first- and last-mile. A common assumption that walking is a last resort, and only chosen when there are no other options available was not confirmed by the findings of this study. Moreover, competition between the modes showed that private bicycles are the preferred mode after walking, followed by private e-scooters, while shared modes were less likely to be chosen over walking, and shared e-scooters less so than shared bicycles. Overall, the findings suggest that a small percentage of the sample – mainly young (<35 years old) and male respondents with interest in and experience of e-scooters – were interested in using private and shared e-scooters for the first- and last-mile, but that the majority of the respondents were likely to choose walking, albeit with longer travel times overall.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Travel Behaviour and Society
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100926
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

User characteristics and preferences for micromobility use in first- and last-mile journeys in Dublin, Ireland

Brian Caulfield, Páraic Carroll, Giulia Oeschger
7 citations
Travel Behaviour and Society
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.78
article

User characteristics and preferences for micromobility use in first- and last-mile journeys in Dublin, Ireland

Brian Caulfield, Páraic Carroll, Giulia Oeschger
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• A stated preference experiment was conducted with a focus on first- and last-miles of public transport journeys. • A mixed logit model was estimated to identify user characteristics and preferences. • Young (<35 years old) male respondents with experience of e-scooters were interested in private and shared e-scooters. • Respondents with a strong walking preference were less likely to be interested in private micromobility and sharing services. • Private bicycles are the preferred mode after walking, while shared modes were less likely to be chosen over walking. Micromobility and public transport integration is an area of urban mobility that has been increasingly gaining attention and importance. The necessity to provide improvements to public transport services and their spatial reach in order to reduce the number and volume of car trips in cities is irrefutable. The integration of micromobility and public transport is often presented as a valuable strategy to improve door-to-door connectivity and coverage of existing public transport services, via provision of key first- and last-mile or access-egress connections. The aim of this study was to understand and model the propensity of commuters in County Dublin to use micromobility (private and shared) in the first- and last-miles of their public transport journeys. A stated preference experiment was conducted with a focus on these specific segments of the journey and a mixed logit model was estimated to identify user characteristics and preferences based on socio-economic factors, mobility patterns and attitudes towards and previous experience of shared mobility. The results show that, in this particular case study, respondents with a strong walking preference were less likely to be interested in private micromobility and sharing services for the first- and last-mile. A common assumption that walking is a last resort, and only chosen when there are no other options available was not confirmed by the findings of this study. Moreover, competition between the modes showed that private bicycles are the preferred mode after walking, followed by private e-scooters, while shared modes were less likely to be chosen over walking, and shared e-scooters less so than shared bicycles. Overall, the findings suggest that a small percentage of the sample – mainly young (<35 years old) and male respondents with interest in and experience of e-scooters – were interested in using private and shared e-scooters for the first- and last-mile, but that the majority of the respondents were likely to choose walking, albeit with longer travel times overall.

Travel Behaviour and SocietyVol. 38
University College Dublin (IE), The University of Melbourne (AU), Trinity College Dublin (IE)
University College Dublin
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.