Digital Afterlife and the Future of Collective Memory

Abstract Digital technology increasingly addresses people dealing with dying, death and grief. The range of options now extends to ai -based forms of “digital afterlife”, in which the deceased are represented digitally in the form of a chatbot or avatar. Based on large amounts of personal data, they can simulate the person’s communicative behavior, including their visual appearance, thus enabling him or her to interact with users. The applications of the so-called Digital Afterlife Industry not only offer new possibilities in the fields of grief culture, the education sector, and the entertainment industry, but also raise ethical, legal and security-related questions that have so far received little attention. At the intersection of technological innovation (especially artificial intelligence), cultures of mourning and collective memory, this article discusses the (potential) social effects of a digital afterlife and its implication in terms of memory. We will particularly address the fact that more and more people in their everyday life are able to use a digital public representation, which continues after their death and with which users can interact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory studies review.
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/29498902-202400013
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Afterlife and the Future of Collective Memory

Matthias Meitzler, Regina Ammicht Quinn, Jessica Heesen, Martin Hennig
8 citations
Memory studies review.
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
33.74
article

Digital Afterlife and the Future of Collective Memory

Matthias Meitzler, Regina Ammicht Quinn, Jessica Heesen, Martin Hennig
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Digital technology increasingly addresses people dealing with dying, death and grief. The range of options now extends to ai -based forms of “digital afterlife”, in which the deceased are represented digitally in the form of a chatbot or avatar. Based on large amounts of personal data, they can simulate the person’s communicative behavior, including their visual appearance, thus enabling him or her to interact with users. The applications of the so-called Digital Afterlife Industry not only offer new possibilities in the fields of grief culture, the education sector, and the entertainment industry, but also raise ethical, legal and security-related questions that have so far received little attention. At the intersection of technological innovation (especially artificial intelligence), cultures of mourning and collective memory, this article discusses the (potential) social effects of a digital afterlife and its implication in terms of memory. We will particularly address the fact that more and more people in their everyday life are able to use a digital public representation, which continues after their death and with which users can interact.

Memory studies review.Vol. 1(2)
University of Tübingen (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
33.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.