Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions

The increase in scientific production has generated a recurring problem on a global scale in the recommendation of reviewers for scientific journals and academic events, incentivizing the emergence of a significant diversity of automated solutions. Thisarticle presents a systematic review of these reviewer recommendation solutions published in scientific journals and academic events in the period 2018-2023. Methodologically, the final selection focused on the analysis of twenty-five articles. It covered the domain of reviewer recommendation solutions, their methods, factors and the data sets utilized. The results achieved systematize the diverse types of proposed solutions allowing to observe the similarities between the different methods. It is estimated that the present mapping provides an original survey on this problem that provides well-founded comparative information to support future research on reviewer recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24215/16666038.24.e16
Primary Topic
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions

Patricia Silvana San Martín, Guillermo Omar Decoppet
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Expert finding and Q&A systems
article

Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions

Patricia Silvana San Martín, Guillermo Omar Decoppet
article en

Abstract

The increase in scientific production has generated a recurring problem on a global scale in the recommendation of reviewers for scientific journals and academic events, incentivizing the emergence of a significant diversity of automated solutions. Thisarticle presents a systematic review of these reviewer recommendation solutions published in scientific journals and academic events in the period 2018-2023. Methodologically, the final selection focused on the analysis of twenty-five articles. It covered the domain of reviewer recommendation solutions, their methods, factors and the data sets utilized. The results achieved systematize the diverse types of proposed solutions allowing to observe the similarities between the different methods. It is estimated that the present mapping provides an original survey on this problem that provides well-founded comparative information to support future research on reviewer recommendations.

Journal of Computer Science and TechnologyVol. 24(2)
Universidad Abierta Interamericana (AR)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Expert finding and Q&A systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.